Website review, no card needed
rivieramaison.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202642 issues · 65 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on rivieramaison.com, 14 of them high impact, across 65 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 125 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 136 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.5 s
2.0 s
2.5 s
3.0 s
3.5 s
4.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.0 s44 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.
Avoid multiple page redirects
1.8 sThe page goes through 6 redirects before it starts loading, costing about 1.8 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
470 ms · 2.0 MBAbout 2.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 470 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 3.4 MB and 967 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
460 ms · 179 KiBAbout 179 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 460 ms faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 330 ms
330 msYouTube costs a phone 330 ms of main-thread work and 1,014 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
400 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).
Google Tag Manager adds 305 ms
305 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 305 ms of main-thread work and 604 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
320 KiB7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (320 KiB).
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Facebook adds 163 ms
163 msFacebook costs a phone 163 ms of main-thread work and 356 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
bedigital.ai adds 49 ms
49 msbedigital.ai costs a phone 49 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 143 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
126 KiB5 images could be 126 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Document request latency
100 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 100 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.30
0.30For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.30 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 26.8 s
26.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.0 s
6.0 sYour largest element takes 6.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Hello autumn Ontdek de nieuwe collectie”.
Speed Index: 8.5 s
8.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.416
0.416The layout shifts by 0.416 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 846 ms
846 msReal visitors wait 846 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 502 ms
502 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 502 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 127 ms to 136 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 120 ms
120 msReal visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors
-20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.3 MB in 144 requests
4.3 MBYour homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 144 requests on a phone: scripts 3.5 MB (53), images 336 KiB (15) and stylesheets 223 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.23 g of CO₂e: 148.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Links do not have a discernible name
Links do not have a discernible name (1 element).
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (18 characters)
Your title is only 18 characters: “Human verification”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://rivieramaison.com/sitemap_index.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
1 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://rivieramaison.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
4 console errors
4 errors were logged to the browser console during Google's test (“Access to font at 'https://urbancotton.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/10/Poppins-Light.ttf' fro…”).
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
Only about 61 words
The homepage has only about 61 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact support”.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rivieramaison.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Hosting
- Combell
Company
- Headquarters
- Amsterdam
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on rivieramaison.com, including 23 speed issues, 9 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.