Website review, no card needed

rjc.ca logo

rjc.ca website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202639 issues · 85 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on rjc.ca, 12 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.7 sMay 16Oct 313.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Oct 31, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
97 ms79 msMay 16Oct 3186 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202685 ms
May 23, 202686 ms
May 30, 202687 ms
Jun 6, 202687 ms
Jun 13, 202688 ms
Jun 20, 202684 ms
Jun 27, 202682 ms
Jul 4, 202686 ms
Jul 11, 202681 ms
Jul 18, 202682 ms
Jul 25, 202681 ms
Aug 1, 202682 ms
Aug 8, 202687 ms
Aug 15, 202688 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 202694 ms
Sep 5, 202694 ms
Sep 12, 202694 ms
Sep 19, 202689 ms
Sep 26, 202689 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms
Oct 10, 202687 ms
Oct 17, 202687 ms
Oct 24, 202687 ms
Oct 31, 202686 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rjc.ca (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rjc.ca at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. rjc.ca at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. rjc.ca at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. rjc.ca at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. rjc.ca at 3.5 s3.5 s
  6. rjc.ca at 4.2 s4.2 s
  7. rjc.ca at 5.0 s5.0 s
  8. rjc.ca at 5.7 s5.7 s

Speed

11 to fix56
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.7 s · 656 KiB

    About 656 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.3 s

    52 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.3 s.

  • audioeye.com adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    audioeye.com costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 299 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (audioeye.com, b-cdn.net and Google CDN and others), adding 6.7 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    740 ms · 154 KiB

    About 154 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 740 ms faster on a phone.

  • b-cdn.net adds 322 ms

    322 ms

    b-cdn.net costs a phone 322 ms of main-thread work and 5.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google CDN adds 257 ms

    257 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 257 ms of main-thread work and 742 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,528 HTML elements

    The page has 2,528 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 166 ms

    166 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 166 ms of main-thread work and 307 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    250 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 120 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    73 KiB

    2 images could be 73 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    19 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (19 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    17 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 17 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 38 ms

    38 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.2 s

    18.2 s

    Your largest element takes 18.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.4 s

    18.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.4 s

    8.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 9 images without width and height

    9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 85 ms to 86 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 86 ms

    86 ms

    Real visitors wait 86 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 171 ms

    171 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 171 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 7.2 MB in 121 requests

    7.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.2 MB in 121 requests on a phone: media 3.6 MB (2), scripts 1.6 MB (47) and images 817 KiB (23). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.05 g of CO₂e: 245.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9696
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 65 form fields without a label

    65 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (36 elements).

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 56 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9274
  • Title is long (70 characters)

    Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Structural Engineering, Building Science & Restoration - RJC Engineers”.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (233 characters)

    Your meta description is 233 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.rjc.ca/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 155 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 155 pages on rjc.ca and 4 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Structural andBuilding ScienceEngineers”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.rjc.ca/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,412 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix69
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.rjc.ca/people/our-leadership/details.html, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://www.rjc.ca/culture/aspire.html, https://www.rjc.ca/ascend.html, https://www.rjc.ca/culture/indigenous.html and https://www.rjc.ca/culture/community.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.rjc.ca/culture/aspire.html has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.rjc.ca/people/our-leadership.html took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 91 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 6 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix79
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Only about 168 words

    The homepage has only about 168 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Sign Up!”.

  • 23 short forms

    23 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 3 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 17 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rjc.ca, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Joomla
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
OVHcloud

Hiring

Hiring
14 open roles
Job board
careers page

Company

Founded
1948
Headquarters
Vancouver

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on rjc.ca, including 20 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25