Website review, no card needed

rnp.br logo

rnp.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202642 issues · 85 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on rnp.br, 19 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.3 s2.8 sMay 9Oct 243.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.5 s
Jun 6, 20263.5 s
Jun 13, 20263.5 s
Jun 20, 20263.4 s
Jun 27, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.5 s
Jul 25, 20263.5 s
Aug 1, 20263.7 s
Aug 8, 20264.1 s
Aug 15, 20264.5 s
Aug 22, 20265.0 s
Aug 29, 20265.0 s
Sep 5, 20265.0 s
Sep 12, 20264.9 s
Sep 19, 20264.4 s
Sep 26, 20264.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.7 s
Oct 10, 20263.7 s
Oct 17, 20263.8 s
Oct 24, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
211 ms123 msMay 9Oct 24188 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026201 ms
May 16, 2026198 ms
May 23, 2026198 ms
May 30, 2026188 ms
Jun 6, 2026183 ms
Jun 13, 2026184 ms
Jun 20, 2026169 ms
Jun 27, 2026158 ms
Jul 4, 2026147 ms
Jul 11, 2026141 ms
Jul 18, 2026139 ms
Jul 25, 2026134 ms
Aug 1, 2026134 ms
Aug 8, 2026136 ms
Aug 15, 2026133 ms
Aug 22, 2026141 ms
Aug 29, 2026141 ms
Sep 5, 2026143 ms
Sep 12, 2026153 ms
Sep 19, 2026155 ms
Sep 26, 2026159 ms
Oct 3, 2026178 ms
Oct 10, 2026180 ms
Oct 17, 2026182 ms
Oct 24, 2026188 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rnp.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rnp.br at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. rnp.br at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. rnp.br at 3.3 s3.3 s
  4. rnp.br at 4.5 s4.5 s
  5. rnp.br at 5.6 s5.6 s
  6. rnp.br at 6.7 s6.7 s
  7. rnp.br at 7.8 s7.8 s
  8. rnp.br at 8.9 s8.9 s

Speed

9 to fix25
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 1.5 MB

    94 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 25

    25/100

    Your mobile performance score is 25 (desktop: 42). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    650 ms · 1.0 MB

    15 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 982 KiB

    About 982 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 911 KiB

    About 911 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 1.0 MB and 927 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 385 ms

    385 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 385 ms of main-thread work and 496 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 41 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 165 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 154 ms

    154 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 154 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 1.42

    1.42

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.42 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.67

    1.67

    The layout shifts by 1.67 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 26.3 s

    26.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 26.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.4 s

    9.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Your largest element takes 5.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Somos uma comunidade. O Sistema RNP nos permite trabalhar c…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 541 ms

    541 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 541 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 28 images without width and height

    28 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 201 ms to 188 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 185 ms

    185 ms

    Real visitors wait 185 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 549 ms

    549 ms

    Real visitors wait 549 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix33
  • Page weight: 5.0 MB in 180 requests

    5.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 180 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (72), images 1.4 MB (36) and stylesheets 996 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    711 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example home-mapa-ciano-1.png at 2,378 px wide, shown at 331 px. Resized copies would save about 711 KiB.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (1.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (1.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.41 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.41 g of CO₂e: 169.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8592
  • 21 text elements with low contrast

    21 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (28 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 28 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 13 links without text

    13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h1 → h3 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 7 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8578
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“A genteconecta.”, “Conectar étransformarvidas.” and “Somos a Rede Brasileira paraEducação e Pesquisa.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 109 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 109 pages on rnp.br and 15 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 40 characters

    Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “RNP | REDE NACIONAL DE ENSINO E PESQUISA”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rnp.br/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rnp.br/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (985 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /sobre-nos, /sobre-nos/quem-somos, /sobre-nos/nossa-historia, /sobre-nos/governanca, /sobre-nos/trabalhe-conosco and /sistema-rnp and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    /sobre-nos, /sistema-rnp/redes-metropolitanas, /sistema-rnp/colaboracoes-internacionais and /sistema-rnp/mapas took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 53 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,296 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,296 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rnp.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on rnp.br, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25