Website review, no card needed

roachconveyors.com logo

roachconveyors.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202638 issues · 84 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on roachconveyors.com, 18 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.8 s3.8 sApr 25Oct 105.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20264.0 s
May 2, 20264.1 s
May 9, 20264.0 s
May 16, 20264.0 s
Jun 6, 20265.0 s
Jun 13, 20264.5 s
Jun 20, 20264.6 s
Jun 27, 20264.6 s
Jul 4, 20264.3 s
Jul 11, 20264.3 s
Jul 18, 20264.2 s
Jul 25, 20264.2 s
Aug 1, 20264.3 s
Aug 8, 20264.9 s
Aug 15, 20264.8 s
Aug 22, 20264.5 s
Aug 29, 20264.6 s
Sep 5, 20264.6 s
Sep 12, 20264.8 s
Sep 19, 20265.0 s
Sep 26, 20265.1 s
Oct 3, 20265.5 s
Oct 10, 20265.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
94 ms85 msJun 13Sep 2693 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 13, 202688 ms
Jun 20, 202688 ms
Sep 5, 202688 ms
Sep 12, 202686 ms
Sep 19, 202686 ms
Sep 26, 202693 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of roachconveyors.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. roachconveyors.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. roachconveyors.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. roachconveyors.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. roachconveyors.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. roachconveyors.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  6. roachconveyors.com at 5.1 s5.1 s
  7. roachconveyors.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  8. roachconveyors.com at 6.7 s6.7 s

Speed

9 to fix59
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    13.3 s · 5.1 MB

    171 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.1 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.8 s · 744 KiB

    About 744 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.9 s · 803 KiB

    14 images could be 803 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.4 s

    59 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 226 KiB

    About 226 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 71). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.2 MB and 459 ms of main-thread time.

  • YouTube adds 352 ms

    352 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 352 ms of main-thread work and 982 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Font display

    250 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Real visitors wait 5.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 30.9 s

    30.9 s

    Your largest element takes 30.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “EASILY COVERT ROLLER SECTIONS TO TRANSVERSE PUSH TOPS REDUC…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.5 s

    31.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 33% slower for real visitors

    +33%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.0 s to 5.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 35 images without width and height

    35 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 88 ms to 93 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 87 ms

    87 ms

    Real visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 81 ms

    81 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 81 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 6.4 MB in 192 requests

    6.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.4 MB in 192 requests on a phone: images 4.0 MB (57), scripts 1.4 MB (56) and fonts 619 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (364 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (31 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.80 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.80 g of CO₂e: 216.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9497
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    4 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 58 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 2 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8582
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is long (224 characters)

    Your meta description is 224 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 8 links crawlers can't follow

    8 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 80 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 80 pages on roachconveyors.com and 4 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Roach Conveyors | American Made Conveyor Solutions”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://roachconveyors.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://roachconveyors.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    /conveyor_solutions/standard_conveyors and /standard_conveyors all use the title “Standard Conveyors - Roach Conveyors”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    /conveyor_solutions/standard_conveyors and /standard_conveyors use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /standard_conveyors, whose canonical is /conveyor_solutions/standard_conveyors. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    /conveyor_solutions/standard_conveyors, /conveyor_solutions/specialty_conveyors, /conveyor_solutions/parcel_truckloading, /crossx, /news and /techbooks and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 10 pages slow to respond

    /techbooks, /literature, /contact, /rfq, /parts and /testimonial and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7797
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    11 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix61
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 111 words

    The homepage has only about 111 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Contact Us” and “Quote Request”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at roachconveyors.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on roachconveyors.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25