Website review, no card needed

roadrunners.com.br logo

roadrunners.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202641 issues · 83 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on roadrunners.com.br, 16 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s936 msMay 23Nov 71.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.1 s
May 30, 20261.1 s
Jun 6, 20261.1 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Oct 31, 20261.9 s
Nov 7, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
203 ms97 msMay 23Nov 7190 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026110 ms
May 30, 2026109 ms
Jun 6, 2026110 ms
Jun 13, 2026113 ms
Jun 20, 2026115 ms
Jun 27, 2026122 ms
Jul 4, 2026130 ms
Jul 11, 2026130 ms
Jul 18, 2026134 ms
Jul 25, 2026134 ms
Aug 1, 2026139 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026152 ms
Aug 22, 2026156 ms
Aug 29, 2026153 ms
Sep 5, 2026153 ms
Sep 12, 2026158 ms
Sep 19, 2026160 ms
Sep 26, 2026169 ms
Oct 3, 2026179 ms
Oct 10, 2026183 ms
Oct 17, 2026190 ms
Oct 24, 2026191 ms
Oct 31, 2026190 ms
Nov 7, 2026190 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of roadrunners.com.br (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. roadrunners.com.br at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. roadrunners.com.br at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. roadrunners.com.br at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. roadrunners.com.br at 2.9 s2.9 s
  5. roadrunners.com.br at 3.6 s3.6 s
  6. roadrunners.com.br at 4.3 s4.3 s
  7. roadrunners.com.br at 5.0 s5.0 s
  8. roadrunners.com.br at 5.7 s5.7 s

Speed

10 to fix59
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.8 s · 2.5 MB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    3.8 s · 2.5 MB

    12 images could be 2.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.3 MB and 824 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    736 KiB

    About 736 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    480 ms · 93 KiB

    About 93 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 480 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 381 ms

    381 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 381 ms of main-thread work and 537 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 695 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • JSDelivr CDN adds 22 ms

    22 ms

    JSDelivr CDN costs a phone 22 ms of main-thread work and 299 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 176 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    1 KiB

    1 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 317 ms

    317 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 317 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.8 s

    9.8 s

    Your largest element takes 9.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Maratona de Curitiba 2026”.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.6 s

    25.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 74% slower for real visitors

    +74%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 190 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 74% slower for real visitors

    +74%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 849 ms

    849 ms

    Real visitors wait 849 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 313 ms

    313 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 313 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 146 ms

    146 ms

    Real visitors wait 146 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.073

    0.073

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.073, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix14
  • Page weight: 5.7 MB in 70 requests

    5.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 70 requests on a phone: images 3.4 MB (22), scripts 1.7 MB (19) and fonts 279 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    6V8WJY7M1GF998GDF9DBLQMR2PA4T5NO46MQF1N6PBXJB5QCYL.png weighs 728 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    593 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 6V8WJY7M1GF998GDF9DBLQMR2PA4T5NO46MQF1N6PBXJB5QCYL.png at 1,141 px wide, shown at 313 px. Resized copies would save about 593 KiB.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    HBBKXJ6C668OQDQUYQ4X82EPVC3EU3QKY10RPIU8RRWVH0ZNOT.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (586 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.62 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.62 g of CO₂e: 193.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8092
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h5 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 24 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10096
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url points at a different host (https://runnerhub.run/)”.

  • 60 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 60 pages on roadrunners.com.br and 17 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 117 characters

    Your meta description is 117 characters: “Descubra provas, acompanhe resultados, explore conteúdo editorial e viva a corrida com mais contexto no Road Runners.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Road Runners”.

  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Road Runners - O ponto de encontro da corrida.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://roadrunners.run/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://roadrunners.run/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix70
  • Parts of the site are closed to 2 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

2 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (810 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://roadrunners.run/llms.txt (3 KiB, 14 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://roadrunners.run/estado, whose canonical is https://roadrunners.run/estado/sc. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://roadrunners.run/evento/2026-maratona-internacional-de-maringa and https://roadrunners.run/evento/2026-101-corrida-internacional-de-sao-silvestre took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'addEventListener')”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    48 of 54 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 560 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 560 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 20 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at roadrunners.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on roadrunners.com.br, including 20 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25