Website review, no card needed

rollingstone.com logo

rollingstone.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202639 issues · 92 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on rollingstone.com, 18 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 11.2 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.9 sApr 18Oct 31.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20262.0 s
Apr 25, 20262.0 s
May 2, 20262.0 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
221 ms153 msApr 18Oct 3163 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026192 ms
Apr 25, 2026202 ms
May 2, 2026206 ms
May 9, 2026213 ms
May 16, 2026204 ms
May 23, 2026205 ms
May 30, 2026207 ms
Jun 6, 2026198 ms
Jun 13, 2026194 ms
Jun 20, 2026183 ms
Jun 27, 2026180 ms
Jul 4, 2026178 ms
Jul 11, 2026172 ms
Jul 18, 2026170 ms
Jul 25, 2026165 ms
Aug 1, 2026163 ms
Aug 8, 2026163 ms
Aug 15, 2026162 ms
Aug 22, 2026161 ms
Aug 29, 2026162 ms
Sep 5, 2026164 ms
Sep 12, 2026165 ms
Sep 19, 2026165 ms
Sep 26, 2026165 ms
Oct 3, 2026163 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rollingstone.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rollingstone.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. rollingstone.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. rollingstone.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  4. rollingstone.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  5. rollingstone.com at 6.2 s6.2 s
  6. rollingstone.com at 7.5 s7.5 s
  7. rollingstone.com at 8.7 s8.7 s
  8. rollingstone.com at 10.0 s10.0 s

Speed

12 to fix15
  • Main-thread work: 11.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 11.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.0 s

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 15

    15/100

    Your mobile performance score is 15 (desktop: 49). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Cloudflare CDN, Google Tag Manager and Ad Lightning and others), adding 3.2 MB and 2.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    100 ms · 1.8 MB

    184 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Cloudflare CDN adds 696 ms

    696 ms

    Cloudflare CDN costs a phone 696 ms of main-thread work and 695 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 426 ms

    426 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 426 ms of main-thread work and 670 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Ad Lightning adds 386 ms

    386 ms

    Ad Lightning costs a phone 386 ms of main-thread work and 147 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 332 ms

    332 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 332 ms of main-thread work and 502 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Optanon adds 304 ms

    304 ms

    Optanon costs a phone 304 ms of main-thread work and 334 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,017 HTML elements

    The page has 2,017 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 213 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    142 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 142 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    47 KiB

    2 images could be 47 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    47 KiB

    About 47 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 49 but mobile only 15. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify JavaScript

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 71 ms

    71 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 71 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.35

    0.35

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.35 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 18.9 s

    18.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 18.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 71.4 s

    71.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 71.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Your largest element takes 7.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “albums of 1976”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.424

    0.424

    The layout shifts by 0.424 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 126 ms

    126 ms

    Real visitors wait 126 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 711 ms

    711 ms

    Real visitors wait 711 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 192 ms to 163 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 8.1 MB in 1,138 requests

    8.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.1 MB in 1,138 requests on a phone: scripts 5.4 MB (261), fonts 1.0 MB (24) and other files 776 KiB (448). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (20 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.29 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.29 g of CO₂e: 275.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8290
  • Hidden but focusable

    3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 33 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 8598
  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 158 internal links, 73 external

    The homepage links to 158 pages on rollingstone.com and 73 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 89 characters

    Your meta description is 89 characters: “Get the latest Rolling Stone news with exclusive stories and pictures from Rolling Stone.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “.RS-logo-filigree-cls-1{fill:#e60019}.RS-logo-filigree-cls-2{fill:#fff}.RS-logo-filigree-cls-3{fill:#929497}.RS-logo-fi…”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Rolling Stone – Music, Film, TV and Political News Coverage”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rollingstone.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rollingstone.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 3 AI answer engine crawlers

    3 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,590 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix75
  • 1 page without a title

    /manage-print-account has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 7 pages without a meta description

    /tips, /manage-print-account, /music, /politics, /culture and /author/jack-crosbie and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /manage-print-account has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /manage-print-account has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 98 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 3583
  • 25 third-party cookies

    25 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught (in promise) NotSupportedError: Failed to execute 'browsingTopics' on 'Document': document.browsingTopics() is…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 987 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 987 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “RS Shop”, “Contact” and “Subscribe”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Hotjar.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 32 cookies set on arrival

    32

    Opening the homepage sets 32 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 88 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 88 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rollingstone.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar

Company

Founded
1967
Headquarters
New York City

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on rollingstone.com, including 20 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25