Website review, no card needed

romet.pl logo

romet.pl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202630 issues · 61 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on romet.pl, 13 of them high impact, across 61 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.6 s3.8 sMay 2Oct 174.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.9 s
May 9, 20263.9 s
May 16, 20263.9 s
May 23, 20263.9 s
May 30, 20263.9 s
Jun 6, 20264.0 s
Jun 13, 20264.1 s
Jun 20, 20264.1 s
Jun 27, 20264.1 s
Jul 4, 20264.1 s
Jul 11, 20264.1 s
Jul 18, 20264.1 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.9 s
Aug 8, 20264.0 s
Aug 15, 20264.0 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20264.0 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20264.1 s
Sep 19, 20264.2 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.3 s
Oct 10, 20264.4 s
Oct 17, 20264.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
395 ms256 msMay 2Oct 17316 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026379 ms
May 9, 2026373 ms
May 16, 2026371 ms
May 23, 2026365 ms
May 30, 2026352 ms
Jun 6, 2026335 ms
Jun 13, 2026321 ms
Jun 20, 2026310 ms
Jun 27, 2026309 ms
Jul 4, 2026313 ms
Jul 11, 2026311 ms
Jul 18, 2026311 ms
Jul 25, 2026310 ms
Aug 1, 2026305 ms
Aug 8, 2026296 ms
Aug 15, 2026285 ms
Aug 22, 2026275 ms
Aug 29, 2026272 ms
Sep 5, 2026280 ms
Sep 12, 2026289 ms
Sep 19, 2026299 ms
Sep 26, 2026301 ms
Oct 3, 2026306 ms
Oct 10, 2026312 ms
Oct 17, 2026316 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of romet.pl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. romet.pl at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. romet.pl at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. romet.pl at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. romet.pl at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. romet.pl at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. romet.pl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. romet.pl at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. romet.pl at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

1 to fix85
  • Mobile performance score: 85

    85/100

    Your mobile performance score is 85 (desktop: 94). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    62 KiB

    4 images could be 62 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    42 KiB

    About 42 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 133 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify CSS

    12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 10 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 262 ms

    262 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 262 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Real visitors wait 4.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 1.01

    1.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user INP: 362 ms

    362 ms

    Real visitors wait 362 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Your largest element takes 3.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Speed Index: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 4.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 540 ms

    540 ms

    Real visitors wait 540 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 379 ms to 316 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Time to Interactive: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The page is fully interactive after 3.5 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.009

    0.009

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.009, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.27 g of CO₂e: 33.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 992 KiB in 37 requests

    992 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 992 KiB in 37 requests on a phone: images 394 KiB (24), scripts 388 KiB (5) and fonts 133 KiB (7). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8091
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 5 buttons without a name

    5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 10048
  • No page title

    Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.

  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://romet.pl/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

1 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://romet.pl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 76 words

    The homepage has only about 76 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at romet.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar

Company

Founded
1991
Headquarters
Podgrodzie

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on romet.pl, including 9 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25