Website review, no card needed
rondo.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202638 issues · 83 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on rondo.com, 13 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 271 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 284 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 263 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 258 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 289 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 284 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 107 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.1 s · 317 KiB5 images could be 317 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.8 s · 310 KiB7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (310 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.6 s · 285 KiBAbout 285 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Hubspot, Google Tag Manager and usemessages.com and others), adding 9.8 MB and 312 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 59
59/100Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 81). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
prismic.io adds 9 ms
9 msprismic.io costs a phone 9 ms of main-thread work and 9.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
Hubspot adds 156 ms
156 msHubspot costs a phone 156 ms of main-thread work and 307 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 116 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
25 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 25 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.6 s
A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 879 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 23 ms
23 msYour server sent the HTML in 23 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.8 s
11.8 sYour largest element takes 11.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The Rondo Heat Battery converts intermittent wind and solar…”.
First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s
4.6 sThe first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 11.8 s
11.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.4 s
6.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
8 checks passed
Real-user INP: 104 ms
104 msReal visitors wait 104 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 738 ms
738 msReal visitors wait 738 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 63% faster for real visitors
-63%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 271 ms to 107 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 48% faster for real visitors
-48%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.5 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 160 ms
160 msScripts block the page for only 160 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.8 MB in 73 requests
10.8 MBYour homepage downloads 10.8 MB in 73 requests on a phone: media 9.3 MB (1), scripts 885 KiB (24) and images 389 KiB (22). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
21 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example image at 1,200 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 21 KiB.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (107 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit
3.06 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.06 g of CO₂e: 366.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
16 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h2 → h4 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 62 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (12 characters)
Your title is only 12 characters: “Rondo Energy”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Firm Heat & Power” and “Our Customers”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (171 characters)
Your meta description is 171 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at rondo.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
46 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 46 pages on rondo.com and 20 external pages.
2 checks passed
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rondo.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.rondo.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (805 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
8 pages without a meta description
https://www.rondo.com/industry/aluminum, https://www.rondo.com/industry/cement, https://www.rondo.com/industry/chemicals, https://www.rondo.com/industry/consumer-goods, https://www.rondo.com/industry/direct-air-capture and https://www.rondo.com/industry/district-energy and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
https://www.rondo.com/contact, https://www.rondo.com/news-press/rondo-energy-and-rio-tinto-advance-australias-larg, https://www.rondo.com/how-it-works and https://www.rondo.com/news-press/rondo-energy-and-siam-cement-group-plan-90gwh-battery-factory-worlds-largest have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.rondo.com/contact has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
21 third-party cookies
21 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 791 words of copy
The homepage carries about 791 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn More” and “Download Now”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
18 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rondo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Vercel
Hiring
- Hiring
- 14 open roles
- Teams
- Structures & Insulation (2), Supply Chain (2), Commercial & Corporate Counsel (1), Delivery (1)
- Job board
- greenhouse
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on rondo.com, including 14 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.