Website review, no card needed

royaloaks.com logo

royaloaks.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202641 issues · 96 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on royaloaks.com, 17 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.4 sMay 9Oct 241.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Oct 24, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
113 ms93 msMay 9Oct 24110 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202695 ms
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 2026105 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026104 ms
Jun 13, 2026102 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 2026105 ms
Jul 4, 2026106 ms
Jul 11, 2026105 ms
Jul 18, 2026103 ms
Jul 25, 202696 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202696 ms
Aug 15, 2026100 ms
Aug 22, 202698 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 2026102 ms
Sep 12, 202697 ms
Sep 19, 2026104 ms
Sep 26, 2026104 ms
Oct 3, 2026105 ms
Oct 10, 2026111 ms
Oct 17, 2026107 ms
Oct 24, 2026110 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of royaloaks.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. royaloaks.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. royaloaks.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. royaloaks.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. royaloaks.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. royaloaks.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  6. royaloaks.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  7. royaloaks.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  8. royaloaks.com at 5.7 s5.7 s

Speed

14 to fix22
  • Render-blocking requests

    10.9 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 10.9 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7.3 s · 1.8 MB

    32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.7 s · 1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 22

    22/100

    Your mobile performance score is 22. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (formstack.com, talkfurther.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 5.3 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.1 MB

    9 images could be 2.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • formstack.com adds 988 ms

    988 ms

    formstack.com costs a phone 988 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    500 ms · 117 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 117 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 570 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    450 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).

  • website-files.com adds 94 ms

    94 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 94 ms of main-thread work and 2.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • talkfurther.com adds 193 ms

    193 ms

    talkfurther.com costs a phone 193 ms of main-thread work and 436 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 160 ms

    160 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 160 ms of main-thread work and 358 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 31 KiB

    About 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 19.4 s

    19.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 19.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 36.5 s

    36.5 s

    Your largest element takes 36.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “When Was The Last Time You Worried About — Nothing at All?”.

  • Speed Index: 19.4 s

    19.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 19.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 37.5 s

    37.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 37.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.198

    0.198

    The layout shifts by 0.198 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 9 images without width and height

    9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 110 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 97 ms

    97 ms

    Real visitors wait 97 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 8.7 MB in 226 requests

    8.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.7 MB in 226 requests on a phone: scripts 2.9 MB (50), fonts 2.7 MB (79) and images 2.7 MB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    680a65832a0910dfce902e66_ROAK-homehero-1920x775-p-500.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (588 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.46 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.46 g of CO₂e: 294.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8989
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (5 elements)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 21 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9291
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (LocalBusiness and Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 62 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 62 pages on royaloaks.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “Royal Oaks, Sun City is a nonprofit Retirement Community promoting healthy, engaging activities, inspiring experiences,…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “When Was The Last Time You Worried About — Nothing at All?”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Retirement Community In Sun City, Arizona | Royal Oaks”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.royaloaks.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.royaloaks.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (585 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.royaloaks.com/llms.txt (9 KiB, 36 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.royaloaks.com/our-team and https://www.royaloaks.com/aventur-team use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6574
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=355027879&Ver=2&mid=8213a325-e8cb-48f1-b481-3d14bb971634&bo=1&sid=453f6710d3dc11f1bbf033a1fb04a152&vid=453f8840d3dc11f187fd591bbe4ce8cc&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&l.

  • 9 third-party cookies

    9 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “$ is not defined”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix89
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 487 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 487 words of visible text.

8 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “ REQUEST INFORMATION: 623-208-6621” and “REQUEST INFORMATION: 623-208-6621”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “JOIN OUR TEAM: 623-323-9728”, “Request Information” and “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 11 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 22 cookies set on arrival

    22

    Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 45 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 45 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at royaloaks.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Webflow

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on royaloaks.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25