Website review, no card needed

royaloak.com logo

royaloak.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202643 issues · 92 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on royaloak.com, 16 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.2 sMay 16Oct 312.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
142 ms100 msMay 16Oct 31120 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026125 ms
May 23, 2026121 ms
May 30, 2026115 ms
Jun 6, 2026112 ms
Jun 13, 2026112 ms
Jun 20, 2026111 ms
Jun 27, 2026121 ms
Jul 4, 2026125 ms
Jul 11, 2026117 ms
Jul 18, 2026111 ms
Jul 25, 2026105 ms
Aug 1, 2026105 ms
Aug 8, 2026112 ms
Aug 15, 2026119 ms
Aug 22, 2026128 ms
Aug 29, 2026128 ms
Sep 5, 2026137 ms
Sep 12, 2026130 ms
Sep 19, 2026130 ms
Sep 26, 2026128 ms
Oct 3, 2026121 ms
Oct 10, 2026120 ms
Oct 17, 2026117 ms
Oct 24, 2026113 ms
Oct 31, 2026120 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of royaloak.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. royaloak.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. royaloak.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. royaloak.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. royaloak.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  5. royaloak.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  6. royaloak.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  7. royaloak.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  8. royaloak.com at 6.7 s6.7 s

Speed

12 to fix47
  • Improve image delivery

    10.6 s · 4.1 MB

    9 images could be 4.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.4 s · 1.7 MB

    About 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.0 s · 941 KiB

    34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (941 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    44 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 47

    47/100

    Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, YouTube and Facebook and others), adding 3.4 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 239 KiB

    About 239 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 441 ms

    441 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 441 ms of main-thread work and 902 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • YouTube adds 343 ms

    343 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 343 ms of main-thread work and 979 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 216 ms

    216 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 216 ms of main-thread work and 413 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ZenDesk adds 174 ms

    174 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 174 ms of main-thread work and 392 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 79 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 79 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 165 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.41

    0.41

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.41 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 35.1 s

    35.1 s

    Your largest element takes 35.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Speed Index: 15.8 s

    15.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 41.3 s

    41.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 41.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 505 ms

    505 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 505 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 120 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 127 ms

    127 ms

    Real visitors wait 127 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 10.2 MB in 193 requests

    10.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.2 MB in 193 requests on a phone: images 5.2 MB (14), scripts 3.5 MB (70) and fonts 993 KiB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (162 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (62 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.88 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.88 g of CO₂e: 345.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9294
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 5 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9270
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (16 characters)

    Your title is only 16 characters: “Home - Royal Oak”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (166 characters)

    Your meta description is 166 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.royaloak.com/wp-sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 47 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 47 pages on royaloak.com and 17 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.royaloak.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.royaloak.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (574 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://www.royaloak.com/our-products, https://www.royaloak.com/product-category/lump-charcoal, https://www.royaloak.com/product-category/charcoal-briquets, https://www.royaloak.com/product-category/charcoalpellets, https://www.royaloak.com/product-category/starters and https://www.royaloak.com/product-category/lighter-fluid and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 8 pages without an H1

    https://www.royaloak.com/about, https://www.royaloak.com/ambassadors, https://www.royaloak.com/bbq-teams, https://www.royaloak.com/get-grilling, https://www.royaloak.com/how-to and https://www.royaloak.com/recipes and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 23 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix78
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 390 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 390 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Shop Gear”, “Shop the #1 Firestarter*” and “Shop the Charcoal of Champions®”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and The Trade Desk and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 20 cookies set on arrival

    20

    Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 33 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 33 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at royaloak.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2023.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
WP Engine

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on royaloak.com, including 23 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25