Website review, no card needed
rwsmithco.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202645 issues · 91 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on rwsmithco.com, 13 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 72 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 75 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 75 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 75 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 81 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.4 s
2.1 s
2.7 s
3.4 s
4.1 s
4.8 s
5.5 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.5 s · 691 KiB67 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (691 KiB).
Improve image delivery
1.9 s · 874 KiB8 images could be 874 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 284 KiBAbout 284 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 27
27/100Your mobile performance score is 27 (desktop: 61). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and others), adding 690 KiB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
900 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 51 KiBAbout 51 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 434 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 382 ms
382 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 382 ms of main-thread work and 180 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Accessibe Accessibility Overlay adds 367 ms
367 msAccessibe Accessibility Overlay costs a phone 367 ms of main-thread work and 243 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 367 ms
367 msFacebook costs a phone 367 ms of main-thread work and 214 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,975 HTML elements
The page has 1,975 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
50 ms · 19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 61 but mobile only 27. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Minify JavaScript
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 18 ms
18 msYour server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.32
0.32For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.32 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.3 s
11.3 sYour largest element takes 11.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Prepping Essentials for Take-Out”.
Time to Interactive: 11.3 s
11.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.6 s
7.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s
1.0 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 38% slower for real visitors
+38%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.236
0.236The layout shifts by 0.236 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
17 images without width and height
17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 72 ms to 81 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Real-user INP: 80 ms
80 msReal visitors wait 80 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
4 images in older formats
4 images (903 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (457 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.55 g of CO₂e: 65.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 1.9 MB in 91 requests
1.9 MBYour homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 91 requests on a phone: images 1.0 MB (44), scripts 733 KiB (24) and stylesheets 98 KiB (13). That is a lean page.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (32 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 41 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
682 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 682 pages on rwsmithco.com and 10 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 136 characters
Your meta description is 136 characters: “Find inspiration and shop commercial quality tabletop products and kitchen supplies for your restaurant, bar, casino or…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Discover Ways to Inspire”.
Title: 61 characters
Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Foodservice Equipment, Supplies & Design | Trimark R.W. Smith”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.rwsmithco.com//.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rwsmithco.com/sitemapindex.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,027 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/shopping_cart.php has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /i199/Career-Center/Main, whose canonical is /i199/Career-Center. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
9 pages without an H1
/pg90/Customer-Service, /shopping_cart.php, /i225/Premier-Collections, /Tria/c1, /Tria/Tria-Cups-and-Saucers/c1_1323 and /Tria/Tria-Dinnerware/c1_468 and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
13 small tap targets
13 of 25 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
3 low-resolution images
3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 363 words of copy
The homepage carries about 363 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more” and “Contact Us”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Quick Order”, “Register Carts” and “Shop Sales”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
15 cookies set on arrival
15Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
20 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rwsmithco.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on rwsmithco.com, including 27 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.