Website review, no card needed

rwu.edu logo

rwu.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202638 issues · 85 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on rwu.edu, 15 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.2 sMay 9Oct 241.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
209 ms158 msMay 9Oct 24202 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026164 ms
May 16, 2026170 ms
May 23, 2026171 ms
May 30, 2026172 ms
Jun 6, 2026172 ms
Jun 13, 2026177 ms
Jun 20, 2026173 ms
Jun 27, 2026174 ms
Jul 18, 2026181 ms
Jul 25, 2026175 ms
Aug 1, 2026170 ms
Aug 8, 2026179 ms
Aug 15, 2026187 ms
Aug 22, 2026196 ms
Aug 29, 2026203 ms
Sep 5, 2026197 ms
Sep 12, 2026198 ms
Sep 19, 2026199 ms
Sep 26, 2026200 ms
Oct 3, 2026201 ms
Oct 10, 2026200 ms
Oct 17, 2026200 ms
Oct 24, 2026202 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rwu.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rwu.edu at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. rwu.edu at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. rwu.edu at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. rwu.edu at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. rwu.edu at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. rwu.edu at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. rwu.edu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. rwu.edu at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

14 to fix25
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 12.0 MB

    About 12.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 11.1 s

    11.1 s

    YouTube costs a phone 11.1 s of main-thread work and 20.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 2.9 s of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 30.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 30.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 14.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.6 s · 248 KiB

    About 248 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 25

    25/100

    Your mobile performance score is 25. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 23.6 MB and 15.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 1.6 MB

    5 images could be 1.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 563 KiB

    61 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (563 KiB).

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 626 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 486 ms

    486 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 486 ms of main-thread work and 365 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 402 ms

    402 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 402 ms of main-thread work and 686 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    350 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 70 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 70 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    170 ms · 15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.4 s

    8.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.7 s

    20.7 s

    Your largest element takes 20.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Aerial photo of the Roger Williams University campus.”.

  • Speed Index: 43.4 s

    43.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 43.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 10.8 s

    10.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 10.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 171.2 s

    171.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 171.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 249 ms

    249 ms

    Real visitors wait 249 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors

    +20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 164 ms to 202 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 526 ms

    526 ms

    Real visitors wait 526 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.017

    0.017

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.017, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 29.1 MB in 650 requests

    29.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 29.1 MB in 650 requests on a phone: scripts 21.4 MB (166), HTML 2.4 MB (113) and images 2.2 MB (68). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    37 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Homepage_Hero_2.jpg.webp at 1,400 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 37 KiB.

  • About 8.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.24 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.24 g of CO₂e: 988.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9799
  • Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.

    Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 0 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10085
  • Title is short (25 characters)

    Your title is only 25 characters: “Roger Williams University”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (218 characters)

    Your meta description is 218 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 95 internal links, 37 external

    The homepage links to 95 pages on rwu.edu and 37 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Discover What Makes Us Top 25”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rwu.edu/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rwu.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.rwu.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,523 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.rwu.edu/majors-programs has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7370
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://d.adroll.com/cm/experian/out?af0=0fe6f973&adroll_fpc=133408d1b4a4a79c1f8e78c3eb8d637f-1793485048231&pv=39907010252.89458&arrfrr=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rwu.edu%2F&ats1=manual&advertisable=VLWPZ76U4B.

  • 9 third-party cookies

    9 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_UNKNOWN_URL_SCHEME”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix79
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,312 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,312 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “REQUEST INFO” and “APPLY NOW”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Request Info”, “Apply Now” and “Register for Fall Open House”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 27 cookies set on arrival

    27

    Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 52 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 52 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rwu.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Company

Employees
1,160
Founded
1956

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on rwu.edu, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25