Website review, no card needed

sa-nu.com logo

sa-nu.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202638 issues · 84 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on sa-nu.com, 14 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s2.0 sMay 16Oct 312.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Oct 31, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
234 ms181 msMay 16Oct 31226 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026194 ms
May 23, 2026192 ms
May 30, 2026190 ms
Jun 6, 2026189 ms
Jun 13, 2026190 ms
Jun 20, 2026188 ms
Jun 27, 2026189 ms
Jul 4, 2026187 ms
Jul 11, 2026189 ms
Jul 18, 2026189 ms
Jul 25, 2026189 ms
Aug 1, 2026196 ms
Aug 8, 2026201 ms
Aug 15, 2026208 ms
Aug 22, 2026211 ms
Aug 29, 2026211 ms
Sep 5, 2026212 ms
Sep 12, 2026213 ms
Sep 19, 2026217 ms
Sep 26, 2026215 ms
Oct 3, 2026217 ms
Oct 10, 2026221 ms
Oct 17, 2026223 ms
Oct 24, 2026228 ms
Oct 31, 2026226 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sa-nu.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sa-nu.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. sa-nu.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. sa-nu.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. sa-nu.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. sa-nu.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. sa-nu.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. sa-nu.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. sa-nu.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix51
  • Improve image delivery

    13.7 s · 5.1 MB

    15 images could be 5.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 13.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.5 s · 1.1 MB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 800 KiB

    About 800 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 7.3 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Adobe TypeKit adds 62 ms

    62 ms

    Adobe TypeKit costs a phone 62 ms of main-thread work and 5.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 523 ms

    523 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 523 ms of main-thread work and 688 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    400 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).

  • Main-thread work: 3.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Facebook adds 206 ms

    206 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 206 ms of main-thread work and 314 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • immedio.io adds 51 ms

    51 ms

    immedio.io costs a phone 51 ms of main-thread work and 624 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 221 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 59 KiB

    About 59 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    206 KiB

    206 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 26 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Render-blocking requests

    100 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 100 ms.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 66.0 s

    66.0 s

    Your largest element takes 66.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 70.3 s

    70.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 70.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.2 s

    10.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 220 ms

    220 ms

    Real visitors wait 220 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 484 ms

    484 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 484 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 194 ms to 226 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 361 ms

    361 ms

    Real visitors wait 361 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix36
  • Page weight: 14.6 MB in 113 requests

    14.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.6 MB in 113 requests on a phone: images 7.1 MB (26), other files 5.4 MB (34) and scripts 1.9 MB (39). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 2.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    780 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example img-concept-02.CTxceDMH_ZpfXEO.webp at 868 px wide, shown at 229 px. Resized copies would save about 780 KiB.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    img-concept-02.CTxceDMH_ZpfXEO.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (282 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.14 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.14 g of CO₂e: 497.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9593
  • 12 text elements with low contrast

    12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (87 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 87 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Headings should not be empty (4 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 55 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10095
  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“”, “海、山、川へ広がる 販売中のSANU 2nd Home” and “SANUをつくる人”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 22 internal links, 28 external

    The homepage links to 22 pages on sa-nu.com and 28 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 89 characters

    Your meta description is 89 characters: “SANU 2nd Home Co-Ownersは、“使う分だけ”を分かち合うシェア別荘です。お気に入りの山・川・海に、あなたの「もうひとつの家」を持つ暮らしをはじめてみませんか?”.

  • Title: 40 characters

    Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “SANU 2nd Home Co-Owners | 自然がもうひとつの家になる。”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.sa-nu.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sa-nu.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix74
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.sa-nu.com/member, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.sa-nu.com/lp/co-owners/2610-01 and https://www.sa-nu.com/list/bee_kawaguchiko1st use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.sa-nu.com/about has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 133 words

    The homepage has only about 133 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 42 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 42 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sa-nu.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Astro
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Vercel

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on sa-nu.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25