Website review, no card needed

sabateseye.com logo

sabateseye.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202630 issues · 77 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on sabateseye.com, 11 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s878 msMay 2Oct 171.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.0 s
May 9, 20261.0 s
May 16, 20261.1 s
May 23, 20261.1 s
May 30, 20261.1 s
Jun 6, 20261.1 s
Jun 13, 20261.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
130 ms81 msMay 2Oct 1796 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202697 ms
May 9, 202694 ms
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 202696 ms
May 30, 202694 ms
Jun 6, 202688 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202687 ms
Jun 27, 202690 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202688 ms
Aug 1, 202693 ms
Aug 8, 202693 ms
Aug 15, 202692 ms
Aug 22, 202688 ms
Aug 29, 202693 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026111 ms
Sep 19, 2026124 ms
Sep 26, 2026117 ms
Oct 3, 2026115 ms
Oct 10, 2026113 ms
Oct 17, 202696 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sabateseye.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sabateseye.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. sabateseye.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. sabateseye.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. sabateseye.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. sabateseye.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. sabateseye.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. sabateseye.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. sabateseye.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix32
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 192 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (192 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 262 KiB

    About 262 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 32

    32/100

    Your mobile performance score is 32 (desktop: 77). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.2 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (freshpaint-hipaa-maps.com, Google Tag Manager and jQuery CDN and others), adding 1.2 MB and 935 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    500 ms · 229 KiB

    10 images could be 229 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • freshpaint-hipaa-maps.com adds 452 ms

    452 ms

    freshpaint-hipaa-maps.com costs a phone 452 ms of main-thread work and 810 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 77 but mobile only 32. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    7 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 7 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.9 s

    12.9 s

    Your largest element takes 12.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.1 s

    13.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 66% slower for real visitors

    +66%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 97 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 128 ms

    128 ms

    Real visitors wait 128 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.4 MB in 101 requests

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 101 requests on a phone: other files 890 KiB (27), images 807 KiB (39) and scripts 593 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images below the first screen load straight away

    7 images further down the page (197 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (86 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.67 g of CO₂e: 80.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9494
  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (8 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (45 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 45 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 48 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 4 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9295
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 12 links with vague text

    12 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 94 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 94 pages on sabateseye.com and 14 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 145 characters

    Your meta description is 145 characters: “At Sabates Eye Centers, we want our patients to have the best eye health possible, so we’re committed to making eye car…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Convenient Locations Around Kansas City. We Look Forward to Seeing You!”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Sabates Eye Centers: The Kansas City Eye Care Specialists”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.sabateseye.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, MedicalWebPage, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sabateseye.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (772 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.sabateseye.com/llms.txt (3 KiB, 26 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.sabateseye.com/locations/university-health, https://www.sabateseye.com/eye-care-services/cataracts, https://www.sabateseye.com/eye-care-services/cataracts/check-cataract-symptoms, https://www.sabateseye.com/eye-care-services/cataracts/explore-treatment-options and https://www.sabateseye.com/eye-care-services/cataracts/learn-what-happens have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.sabateseye.com/eye-care-services/cataracts/check-cataract-symptoms, https://www.sabateseye.com/eye-care-services/cataracts/explore-treatment-options and https://www.sabateseye.com/eye-care-services/cataracts/learn-what-happens have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 59 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 603 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 603 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BOOK AN APPOINTMENT”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Request Appointment”, “Schedule a Consultation” and “Book an Appointment”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 11 testimonial or review blocks and 48 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sabateseye.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on sabateseye.com, including 18 speed issues and 2 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25