Website review, no card needed
salemstate.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202642 issues · 90 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on salemstate.edu, 10 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 983 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 991 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 999 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 993 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 934 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 922 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 867 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 870 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 942 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 943 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 933 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 939 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 934 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 948 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 944 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 940 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 932 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 945 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 125 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.2 s · 1.0 MB21 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, YouTube and juicer.io and others), adding 9.3 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 1.0 MBAbout 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
973 KiB58 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (973 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
950 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.
juicer.io adds 132 ms
132 msjuicer.io costs a phone 132 ms of main-thread work and 6.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 518 ms
518 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 518 ms of main-thread work and 700 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
YouTube adds 401 ms
401 msYouTube costs a phone 401 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.1 s
A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
youvisit.com adds 112 ms
112 msyouvisit.com costs a phone 112 ms of main-thread work and 440 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 185 KiBAbout 185 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 165 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
29 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 28.6 s
28.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s
7.8 sYour largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “The façade of the Bertolon School of Business is framed by …”.
Speed Index: 7.2 s
7.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 422 ms
422 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 422 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
16 images without width and height
16 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 128 ms to 125 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 129 ms
129 msReal visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 616 ms
616 msReal visitors wait 616 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.013
0.013The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.013, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.7 MB in 168 requests
10.7 MBYour homepage downloads 10.7 MB in 168 requests on a phone: images 7.8 MB (84), scripts 2.2 MB (31) and fonts 412 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images over 500 KB
4 images weigh 5.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
10 images far larger than shown
4.4 MB10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 37240979 at 4,096 px wide, shown at 354 px. Resized copies would save about 4.4 MB.
19 images in older formats
19 images (7.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
14 images below the first screen load straight away
14 images further down the page (6.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
2021_11_16_Salem_State_Fall_Central_Campus_Fall_Autumn-297.j is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 3.0 g of CO₂ per visit
3.04 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.04 g of CO₂e: 365.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (208 characters)
Your meta description is 208 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
100 internal links, 23 external
The homepage links to 100 pages on salemstate.edu and 23 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Salem State University”.
Title: 64 characters
Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Salem State University | A Proud Massachusetts Public University”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.salemstate.edu/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.salemstate.edu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.salemstate.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (677 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.salemstate.edu/alumni-and-friends/meet-moment and https://www.salemstate.edu/moment all use the title “Meet the Moment | Salem State University”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
7 pages without a meta description
https://www.salemstate.edu/accepted-students, https://www.salemstate.edu/alumni-and-friends/meet-moment, https://www.salemstate.edu/explore-city-sea, https://www.salemstate.edu/parent-guide, https://www.salemstate.edu/donate and https://www.salemstate.edu/moment and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.salemstate.edu/moment, whose canonical is https://www.salemstate.edu/alumni-and-friends/meet-moment. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://trck.youvisit.com/embed/60234.png?embed_type=immersive&w=360&h=400&top=4226&left=15&pagewidth=390&pageHeight=5705&screenWidth=390&screenHeight=844&hasImgtag=false&embed=615352799958942348&ab=n.
12 small tap targets
12 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 third-party cookies
6 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 923 words of copy
The homepage carries about 923 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “To learn more, visit our privacy policy.” and “Apply Now”.
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Apply Now”, “Apply” and “Request Info”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Snap Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 4 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
25 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at salemstate.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2019.
Stack
- CMS
- Drupal
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Fastly
Company
- Employees
- 1,276
- Founded
- 1854
- Headquarters
- Salem
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on salemstate.edu, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.