Website review, no card needed

salemstate.edu logo

salemstate.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202642 issues · 90 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on salemstate.edu, 10 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.1 s837 msMay 16Oct 311.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 2026983 ms
May 23, 2026991 ms
May 30, 2026999 ms
Jun 6, 2026993 ms
Jun 13, 20261.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.0 s
Jul 18, 2026934 ms
Jul 25, 2026922 ms
Aug 1, 2026867 ms
Aug 8, 2026870 ms
Aug 15, 2026942 ms
Aug 22, 2026943 ms
Aug 29, 2026933 ms
Sep 5, 2026939 ms
Sep 12, 2026934 ms
Sep 19, 2026948 ms
Sep 26, 2026944 ms
Oct 3, 2026940 ms
Oct 10, 2026932 ms
Oct 17, 2026945 ms
Oct 24, 20261.0 s
Oct 31, 20261.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
140 ms114 msMay 16Oct 31125 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026128 ms
May 23, 2026129 ms
May 30, 2026129 ms
Jun 6, 2026130 ms
Jun 13, 2026132 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026137 ms
Jul 4, 2026127 ms
Jul 11, 2026122 ms
Jul 18, 2026117 ms
Jul 25, 2026117 ms
Aug 1, 2026119 ms
Aug 8, 2026121 ms
Aug 15, 2026132 ms
Aug 22, 2026127 ms
Aug 29, 2026127 ms
Sep 5, 2026122 ms
Sep 12, 2026122 ms
Sep 19, 2026126 ms
Sep 26, 2026122 ms
Oct 3, 2026123 ms
Oct 10, 2026121 ms
Oct 17, 2026121 ms
Oct 24, 2026126 ms
Oct 31, 2026125 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of salemstate.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. salemstate.edu at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. salemstate.edu at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. salemstate.edu at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. salemstate.edu at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. salemstate.edu at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. salemstate.edu at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. salemstate.edu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. salemstate.edu at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix57
  • Improve image delivery

    2.2 s · 1.0 MB

    21 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, YouTube and juicer.io and others), adding 9.3 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 1.0 MB

    About 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    973 KiB

    58 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (973 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • juicer.io adds 132 ms

    132 ms

    juicer.io costs a phone 132 ms of main-thread work and 6.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 518 ms

    518 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 518 ms of main-thread work and 700 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • YouTube adds 401 ms

    401 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 401 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • youvisit.com adds 112 ms

    112 ms

    youvisit.com costs a phone 112 ms of main-thread work and 440 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 185 KiB

    About 185 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 165 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    29 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 28.6 s

    28.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Your largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “The façade of the Bertolon School of Business is framed by …”.

  • Speed Index: 7.2 s

    7.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 422 ms

    422 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 422 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 16 images without width and height

    16 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 128 ms to 125 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Real visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 616 ms

    616 ms

    Real visitors wait 616 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.013

    0.013

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.013, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

6 to fix19
  • Page weight: 10.7 MB in 168 requests

    10.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.7 MB in 168 requests on a phone: images 7.8 MB (84), scripts 2.2 MB (31) and fonts 412 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 5.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 10 images far larger than shown

    4.4 MB

    10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 37240979 at 4,096 px wide, shown at 354 px. Resized copies would save about 4.4 MB.

  • 19 images in older formats

    19 images (7.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 14 images below the first screen load straight away

    14 images further down the page (6.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    2021_11_16_Salem_State_Fall_Central_Campus_Fall_Autumn-297.j is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 3.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.04 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.04 g of CO₂e: 365.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9394
  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8586
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (208 characters)

    Your meta description is 208 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 100 internal links, 23 external

    The homepage links to 100 pages on salemstate.edu and 23 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Salem State University”.

  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Salem State University | A Proud Massachusetts Public University”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.salemstate.edu/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.salemstate.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.salemstate.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (677 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.salemstate.edu/alumni-and-friends/meet-moment and https://www.salemstate.edu/moment all use the title “Meet the Moment | Salem State University”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 7 pages without a meta description

    https://www.salemstate.edu/accepted-students, https://www.salemstate.edu/alumni-and-friends/meet-moment, https://www.salemstate.edu/explore-city-sea, https://www.salemstate.edu/parent-guide, https://www.salemstate.edu/donate and https://www.salemstate.edu/moment and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.salemstate.edu/moment, whose canonical is https://www.salemstate.edu/alumni-and-friends/meet-moment. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7370
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://trck.youvisit.com/embed/60234.png?embed_type=immersive&w=360&h=400&top=4226&left=15&pagewidth=390&pageHeight=5705&screenWidth=390&screenHeight=844&hasImgtag=false&embed=615352799958942348&ab=n.

  • 12 small tap targets

    12 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 third-party cookies

    6 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix88
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 923 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 923 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “To learn more, visit our privacy policy.” and “Apply Now”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Apply Now”, “Apply” and “Request Info”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Snap Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 4 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at salemstate.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2019.

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Fastly

Company

Employees
1,276
Founded
1854
Headquarters
Salem

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on salemstate.edu, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25