Website review, no card needed
salling.dk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202641 issues · 88 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on salling.dk, 17 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 174 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
31.1 s · 6.7 MB16 images could be 6.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 31.1 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.7 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.7 s).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 242 KiBAbout 242 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 60). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.2 s
A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 53 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (53 KiB).
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 272 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,114 HTML elements
The page has 2,114 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
structpim.com adds 0 ms
0 msstructpim.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 773 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, Usercentrics CMP and Bing Ads and others), adding 1,021 KiB and 169 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
98 KiBAbout 98 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 320 ms
320 msYour server sent the HTML in 320 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 40.0 s
40.0 sYour largest element takes 40.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Herre”.
Time to Interactive: 40.0 s
40.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 40.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sThe first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.8 s
8.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 920 ms
920 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 920 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 299 ms
299 msReal visitors wait 299 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 941 ms
941 msReal visitors wait 941 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
62 images without width and height
62 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 150 ms to 174 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.04
0.04The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.04, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.0 MB in 275 requests
11.0 MBYour homepage downloads 11.0 MB in 275 requests on a phone: images 9.8 MB (107), scripts 870 KiB (64) and HTML 174 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
indretning-til-hjemmet.png weighs 733 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
21 images in older formats
21 images (4.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (1.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
herre.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit
3.11 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.11 g of CO₂e: 373.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
5 buttons without a name
5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
13 tap targets too small
13 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
80 images without alt text
80 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
48 links crawlers can't follow
48 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Mode til hende” and “Mode til ham”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
292 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 292 pages on salling.dk and 5 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 112 characters
Your meta description is 112 characters: “På salling.dk kan du shoppe gaver, skønhedsprodukter, fashion, boligartikler og meget mere - hurtigt og sikkert.”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Salling | Shop bolig, skønhed, fashion og meget mere”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://salling.dk/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://salling.dk/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,106 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages share a meta description
https://salling.dk/dame/toej/jakker-frakker/jakker/fox-c-jakke-dark-brown-38/p-1038966, https://salling.dk/dame/toej/jakker-frakker/jakker/fox-c-jakke-black-38/p-865292 and https://salling.dk/dame/toej/jakker-frakker/jakker/fox-c-jakke-navy-38/p-972047 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page slow to respond
https://salling.dk/dame/toej/jakker-frakker/jakker/fox-c-jakke-navy-38/p-972047 took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 165 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
53 small tap targets
53 of 90 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,377 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,377 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop dame →” and “Shop herre →”.
14 calls to action
The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Shop dame →”, “Shop herre →” and “Shop overtøj til sæsonen”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Usercentrics
A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at salling.dk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Nuxt
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Company
- Founded
- 1906
- Headquarters
- Aarhus
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on salling.dk, including 19 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.