Website review, no card needed

sanko.com.tr logo

sanko.com.tr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202636 issues · 78 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on sanko.com.tr, 15 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.5 sMay 9Oct 242.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
107 ms87 msMay 9Oct 2489 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026103 ms
May 16, 2026105 ms
May 23, 2026102 ms
May 30, 202695 ms
Jun 6, 202694 ms
Jun 13, 202693 ms
Jun 20, 202693 ms
Jun 27, 202694 ms
Jul 4, 202693 ms
Jul 11, 202692 ms
Jul 18, 202694 ms
Jul 25, 202696 ms
Aug 1, 202697 ms
Aug 8, 202699 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 202694 ms
Aug 29, 202692 ms
Sep 5, 202691 ms
Sep 12, 202690 ms
Sep 19, 202691 ms
Sep 26, 202693 ms
Oct 3, 202691 ms
Oct 10, 202691 ms
Oct 17, 202693 ms
Oct 24, 202689 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sanko.com.tr (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sanko.com.tr at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. sanko.com.tr at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. sanko.com.tr at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. sanko.com.tr at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. sanko.com.tr at 4.5 s4.5 s
  6. sanko.com.tr at 5.4 s5.4 s
  7. sanko.com.tr at 6.2 s6.2 s
  8. sanko.com.tr at 7.1 s7.1 s

Speed

6 to fix65
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    450 ms · 7.5 MB

    47 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    4.8 MB

    15 images could be 4.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Mobile performance score: 65

    65/100

    Your mobile performance score is 65 (desktop: 80). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 232 KiB

    About 232 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • binclusive.io adds 225 ms

    225 ms

    binclusive.io costs a phone 225 ms of main-thread work and 332 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (binclusive.io, Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare and others), adding 534 KiB and 377 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 35 KiB

    About 35 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 172 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 675 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 165 ms

    165 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 165 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Speed Index: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Geçmişimizden aldığımız güçle geleceğe doğru güvenle ilerli…”. Most of its time is element render delay (4.2 s).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 120 ms

    120 ms

    Real visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 89 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 114 ms

    114 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 114 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004

    0.004

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 8.0 MB in 74 requests

    8.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.0 MB in 74 requests on a phone: images 7.1 MB (30), scripts 687 KiB (25) and fonts 161 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 16 images far larger than shown

    4.4 MB

    16 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example banner-1-scaled-2.webp at 2,560 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 4.4 MB.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 3.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (3.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 14 images below the first screen load straight away

    14 images further down the page (3.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.27 g of CO₂e: 272.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8393
  • 6 tap targets too small

    6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 32 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8578
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (25 characters)

    Your title is only 25 characters: “Ana Sayfa - SANKO Holding”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 53 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 53 pages on sanko.com.tr and 7 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Geçmişimizden aldığımız güçle geleceğe doğru güvenle ilerliyoruz.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://sanko.com.tr/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sanko.com.tr/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://sanko.com.tr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (498 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://sanko.com.tr/hakkimizda, https://sanko.com.tr/tarihcemiz, https://sanko.com.tr/kurucumuz, https://sanko.com.tr/onursal-baskanlarimiz, https://sanko.com.tr/yonetim-kurulu and https://sanko.com.tr/faaliyet-alanlarimiz and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 14 pages without an H1

    https://sanko.com.tr/hakkimizda, https://sanko.com.tr/tarihcemiz, https://sanko.com.tr/onursal-baskanlarimiz, https://sanko.com.tr/yonetim-kurulu, https://sanko.com.tr/faaliyet-alanlarimiz and https://sanko.com.tr/faaliyet-alanlarimiz/tekstil and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://sanko.com.tr/onursal-baskanlarimiz and https://sanko.com.tr/yonetim-kurulu have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 12 small tap targets

    12 of 54 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 550 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 550 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sanko.com.tr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Ttnet

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on sanko.com.tr, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25