Website review, no card needed
sanko.com.tr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202636 issues · 78 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on sanko.com.tr, 15 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 89 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
450 ms · 7.5 MB47 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.5 MB).
Improve image delivery
4.8 MB15 images could be 4.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Mobile performance score: 65
65/100Your mobile performance score is 65 (desktop: 80). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 232 KiBAbout 232 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
binclusive.io adds 225 ms
225 msbinclusive.io costs a phone 225 ms of main-thread work and 332 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (binclusive.io, Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare and others), adding 534 KiB and 377 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 35 KiBAbout 35 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 172 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.6 s
A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 675 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 165 ms
165 msYour server sent the HTML in 165 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 15.2 s
15.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 11.5 s
11.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sThe first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sYour largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Geçmişimizden aldığımız güçle geleceğe doğru güvenle ilerli…”. Most of its time is element render delay (4.2 s).
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 120 ms
120 msReal visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 89 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 114 ms
114 msScripts block the page for only 114 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.0 MB in 74 requests
8.0 MBYour homepage downloads 8.0 MB in 74 requests on a phone: images 7.1 MB (30), scripts 687 KiB (25) and fonts 161 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
16 images far larger than shown
4.4 MB16 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example banner-1-scaled-2.webp at 2,560 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 4.4 MB.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 3.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
15 images in older formats
15 images (3.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
14 images below the first screen load straight away
14 images further down the page (3.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit
2.27 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.27 g of CO₂e: 272.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 32 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (25 characters)
Your title is only 25 characters: “Ana Sayfa - SANKO Holding”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
53 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 53 pages on sanko.com.tr and 7 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Geçmişimizden aldığımız güçle geleceğe doğru güvenle ilerliyoruz.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://sanko.com.tr/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sanko.com.tr/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://sanko.com.tr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (498 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
https://sanko.com.tr/hakkimizda, https://sanko.com.tr/tarihcemiz, https://sanko.com.tr/kurucumuz, https://sanko.com.tr/onursal-baskanlarimiz, https://sanko.com.tr/yonetim-kurulu and https://sanko.com.tr/faaliyet-alanlarimiz and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
14 pages without an H1
https://sanko.com.tr/hakkimizda, https://sanko.com.tr/tarihcemiz, https://sanko.com.tr/onursal-baskanlarimiz, https://sanko.com.tr/yonetim-kurulu, https://sanko.com.tr/faaliyet-alanlarimiz and https://sanko.com.tr/faaliyet-alanlarimiz/tekstil and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://sanko.com.tr/onursal-baskanlarimiz and https://sanko.com.tr/yonetim-kurulu have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
12 small tap targets
12 of 54 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 550 words of copy
The homepage carries about 550 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sanko.com.tr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Ttnet
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on sanko.com.tr, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.