Website review, no card needed

sanmarcosinn.com logo

sanmarcosinn.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202623 issues · 73 checks

This review found 23 issues worth fixing on sanmarcosinn.com, 7 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: 4 images over 500 KB. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of sanmarcosinn.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sanmarcosinn.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. sanmarcosinn.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. sanmarcosinn.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. sanmarcosinn.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. sanmarcosinn.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. sanmarcosinn.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. sanmarcosinn.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. sanmarcosinn.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

1 to fix92
  • Improve image delivery

    4.3 MB

    7 images could be 4.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 92

    92/100

    Your mobile performance score is 92 (desktop: 92). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 7 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

2 to fix89
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.18

    0.18

    The layout shifts by 0.18 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

5 checks passed
  • First Contentful Paint: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.0 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.0 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “BEST WESTERN SAN MARCOS INN IS IDEALLY LOCATED NEAR THE EMB…”.

  • Speed Index: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 1.9 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    The page is fully interactive after 1.0 s.

Images and page weight

2 to fix55
  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 5.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • Page weight: 5.9 MB in 11 requests

    5.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.9 MB in 11 requests on a phone: images 5.9 MB (10) and HTML 13 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (220 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (28 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.67 g of CO₂e: 200.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 8987
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (32 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 44 tap targets too small

    44 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 33 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8584
  • Meta description is long (221 characters)

    Your meta description is 221 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Bad control character in string literal in JSON at position )”.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.sanmarcosinn.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 85 internal links, 22 external

    The homepage links to 85 pages on sanmarcosinn.com and 22 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “WELCOME TO BEST WESTERN SAN MARCOS INN”.

  • Title: 63 characters

    Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Best Western San Marcos Inn | TOP-RANKED HOTEL in Morro Bay, CA”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.sanmarcosinn.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.sanmarcosinn.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,904 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.

  • 3 low-resolution images

    3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    31 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix94
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 742 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 742 words of visible text.

7 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT US”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact UsContact Us”, “Contact Us” and “Personal Data Request”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sanmarcosinn.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 23 issues on sanmarcosinn.com, including 3 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25