Website review, no card needed
sanriaengineering.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202642 issues · 81 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on sanriaengineering.com, 11 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
7.0 s · 4.1 MB12 images could be 4.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.0 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 836 KiB56 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (836 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 664 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 132 KiBAbout 132 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 76 KiBAbout 76 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Unpkg adds 352 ms
352 msUnpkg costs a phone 352 ms of main-thread work and 96 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Unpkg, turbify.com and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 351 KiB and 468 ms of main-thread time.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 623 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 17 ms
17 msYour server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.3 s
17.3 sYour largest element takes 17.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Connection Design Engineering”.
Time to Interactive: 17.6 s
17.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.7 s
6.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 481 ms
481 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 481 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 18.8 MB in 84 requests
18.8 MBYour homepage downloads 18.8 MB in 84 requests on a phone: media 10.3 MB (1), images 6.7 MB (29) and other files 1.1 MB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
intersection.jpg weighs 604 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
6 images in older formats
6 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (730 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
6 images far larger than shown
110 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example intersection.jpg at 1,135 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 110 KiB.
About 5.3 g of CO₂ per visit
5.32 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.32 g of CO₂e: 638.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
4 images without alt text
4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Page language is “zxx”
The page declares lang=“zxx”, which is not a usable language code (“zxx” means “no linguistic content”), so screen readers and translation tools guess.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h6, h1 → h6 and h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (17 characters)
Your title is only 17 characters: “sanriaengineering”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Revolutionizing Engineering”, “Savannah Convention Center” and “Wilson School”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
29 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 29 pages on sanriaengineering.com and 2 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 121 characters
Your meta description is 121 characters: “Design Build & Connection Design Engineering | Building Information Modeling (BIM) | 3D Modeling & Digital Transformati…”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sanriaengineering.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://sanriaengineering.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (694 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
14 pages share a meta description
https://sanriaengineering.com/about.html, https://sanriaengineering.com/our-expertise.html, https://sanriaengineering.com/projects.html, https://sanriaengineering.com/quality-standards.html, https://sanriaengineering.com/contact-us.html and https://sanriaengineering.com/projects/convention-center/savannah-convention-center.html and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
10 pages without an H1
https://sanriaengineering.com/about.html, https://sanriaengineering.com/our-expertise.html, https://sanriaengineering.com/projects.html, https://sanriaengineering.com/quality-standards.html, https://sanriaengineering.com/contact-us.html and https://sanriaengineering.com/case-studies.html and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages with very little text
https://sanriaengineering.com/projects.html, https://sanriaengineering.com/projects/airport-support-facility/united-airlines.html and https://sanriaengineering.com/software.html have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
14 internal pages checked
We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 14 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 small tap targets
5 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 14 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 557 words of copy
The homepage carries about 557 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sanriaengineering.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- Azure
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on sanriaengineering.com, including 14 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.