Website review, no card needed

saracino1925.com logo

saracino1925.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202637 issues · 91 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on saracino1925.com, 16 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.4 s2.2 sMay 16Oct 313.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20264.1 s
Aug 29, 20264.2 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.8 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Oct 31, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
185 ms132 msMay 16Oct 31179 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026154 ms
May 23, 2026153 ms
May 30, 2026147 ms
Jun 6, 2026143 ms
Jun 13, 2026141 ms
Jun 20, 2026138 ms
Jun 27, 2026139 ms
Jul 4, 2026141 ms
Jul 11, 2026144 ms
Jul 18, 2026144 ms
Jul 25, 2026143 ms
Aug 1, 2026143 ms
Aug 8, 2026144 ms
Aug 15, 2026151 ms
Aug 22, 2026153 ms
Aug 29, 2026154 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026145 ms
Sep 19, 2026148 ms
Sep 26, 2026153 ms
Oct 3, 2026159 ms
Oct 10, 2026169 ms
Oct 17, 2026173 ms
Oct 24, 2026178 ms
Oct 31, 2026179 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of saracino1925.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. saracino1925.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. saracino1925.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. saracino1925.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  4. saracino1925.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  5. saracino1925.com at 5.1 s5.1 s
  6. saracino1925.com at 6.1 s6.1 s
  7. saracino1925.com at 7.1 s7.1 s
  8. saracino1925.com at 8.1 s8.1 s

Speed

10 to fix36
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.0 s · 411 KiB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (411 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 427 KiB

    About 427 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (PayPal, Klaviyo and Shopify and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    800 ms

    25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

  • PayPal adds 390 ms

    390 ms

    PayPal costs a phone 390 ms of main-thread work and 232 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 66 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 66 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Klaviyo adds 246 ms

    246 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 246 ms of main-thread work and 330 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 270 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    70 ms · 28 KiB

    About 28 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 70 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    70 ms · 6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    50 ms · 8 KiB

    8 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    26 KiB

    2 images could be 26 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.27

    0.27

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.27 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    Your largest element takes 11.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “OLIO NOVELLO 2026/27 EVO 100% ITALIANO Raccolta a mano, spr…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.9 s

    15.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 759 ms

    759 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 759 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.169

    0.169

    The layout shifts by 0.169 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 154 ms to 179 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 158 ms

    158 ms

    Real visitors wait 158 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 621 ms

    621 ms

    Real visitors wait 621 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.3 MB in 308 requests

    3.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 308 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (101), images 854 KiB (52) and other files 724 KiB (113). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.94 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.94 g of CO₂e: 113.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8392
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 53 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “OLIO NOVELLO 2026/27 EVO 100% ITALIANO”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (165 characters)

    Your meta description is 165 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 63 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 63 pages on saracino1925.com and 4 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Vendita Online di Olio Extravergine 100% Italiano – SARACINO1925”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.saracino1925.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: FAQPage, LocalBusiness and Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.saracino1925.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details; logo would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,327 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.saracino1925.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://www.saracino1925.com/products/olio-novello-2-bag-in-box-da-5-litri, https://www.saracino1925.com/products/10-litri-olio-nuovo-fruttato-2026-27-extravergine-italiano-saracino-1925-2-x-5-litri-bag-in-box, https://www.saracino1925.com/products/olio-pugliese-azienda-agricola-saracino-1925-bag-in-box and https://www.saracino1925.com/products/2-x-bag-in-box-olio-angelino-olio-fruttato-saracino1925 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 9 pages without an H1

    https://www.saracino1925.com/collections/promozioni, https://www.saracino1925.com/collections/olio, https://www.saracino1925.com/collections/vini, https://www.saracino1925.com/collections/taralli, https://www.saracino1925.com/collections/pasta and https://www.saracino1925.com/collections/tutti-i-prodotti and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.saracino1925.com/collections/taralli took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7770
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://app.transtore.app/flags/it.svg.

  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 37 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Authorization will not be covered by the wildcard symbol (*) in CORS `Access-Control-Allow-Headers`…”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Refused to apply style from 'https://www.saracino1925.com/cdn/shop/t/13/assets/popup.css?v=3019' because its MIME type …”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,388 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,388 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “◎ Start Picking Placement”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 28 cookies set on arrival

    28

    Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 45 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 45 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: iubenda

    A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at saracino1925.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Intelligems A B Testing · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Microsoft Clarity · Scalapay On Site Messaging · Transtore Translate Language · Sticky Add To Cart Bar · Page Speed Optimizer · Scalapay Widget Installer Prod · Fatture Italia · trustpilot.com · conversionbear.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2024.

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on saracino1925.com, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25