Website review, no card needed

saregama.com logo

saregama.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202654 issues · 94 checks

This review found 54 issues worth fixing on saregama.com, 22 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.3 sMay 9Oct 242.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
1.1 s587 msMay 9Oct 24666 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 20261.0 s
May 16, 20261.0 s
May 23, 20261.0 s
May 30, 20261.0 s
Jun 6, 20261.0 s
Jun 13, 20261.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.0 s
Jul 18, 20261.0 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.0 s
Aug 8, 2026922 ms
Aug 15, 2026836 ms
Aug 22, 2026771 ms
Aug 29, 2026742 ms
Sep 5, 2026738 ms
Sep 12, 2026730 ms
Sep 19, 2026705 ms
Sep 26, 2026685 ms
Oct 3, 2026662 ms
Oct 10, 2026648 ms
Oct 17, 2026651 ms
Oct 24, 2026666 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of saregama.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. saregama.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. saregama.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. saregama.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. saregama.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  5. saregama.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  6. saregama.com at 6.9 s6.9 s
  7. saregama.com at 8.0 s8.0 s
  8. saregama.com at 9.2 s9.2 s

Speed

11 to fix36
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.3 s · 1.6 MB

    About 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 2.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 49). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 3.2 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.8 MB

    12 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 545 KiB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (545 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 102 KiB

    About 102 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Facebook adds 322 ms

    322 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 322 ms of main-thread work and 438 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,724 HTML elements

    The page has 1,724 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 207 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 16 ms

    16 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 520 ms

    520 ms

    Real visitors wait 520 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.42

    0.42

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.42 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.7 s

    17.7 s

    Your largest element takes 17.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Bihari Ke Dum”.

  • Speed Index: 23.0 s

    23.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 23.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 81.4 s

    81.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 81.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 891 ms

    891 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 891 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 894 ms

    894 ms

    Real visitors wait 894 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 32 images without width and height

    32 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

3 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 35% faster for real visitors

    -35%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 1.0 s to 666 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003

    0.003

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix35
  • Page weight: 22.5 MB in 172 requests

    22.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 22.5 MB in 172 requests on a phone: images 18.6 MB (59), scripts 3.5 MB (52) and fonts 187 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images over 500 KB

    5 images weigh 17.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (17.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    220 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example carvaan_app_floater.gif at 250 px wide, shown at 78 px. Resized copies would save about 220 KiB.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (121 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 6.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.39 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.39 g of CO₂e: 766.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 7782
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 33 images without alt text

    33 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 90 form fields without a label

    90 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (8 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 36 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 12 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8582
  • 169 links crawlers can't follow

    169 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • Title is long (74 characters)

    Your title is 74 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Download MP3 Songs, Buy Carvaan, Book Artistes for Events or Licence Songs”.

  • Meta description is long (366 characters)

    Your meta description is 366 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (Product and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • 128 internal links, 36 external

    The homepage links to 128 pages on saregama.com and 36 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Music Store”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.saregama.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at http://www.saregama.com/sitemap/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (451 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.saregama.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 13 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix76
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.saregama.com/musicstore declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.saregama.com/musicstore and https://www.saregama.com/others all use the title “Evergreen Hindi Songs, Ghazals & Devotional music from Saregama”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://www.saregama.com/musicstore, https://www.saregama.com/bollywood, https://www.saregama.com/regional and https://www.saregama.com/others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.saregama.com/padhanisa has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 82 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 50 small tap targets

    50 of 160 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 411 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 411 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “ENQUIRE NOW →”, “Contact Us” and “Carvaan Service Request”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and a star rating.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 25 cookies set on arrival

    25

    Opening the homepage sets 25 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 32 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at saregama.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Bitgravity

Company

Founded
2000
Headquarters
Kolkata

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 54 issues on saregama.com, including 23 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25