Website review, no card needed

satake-usa.com logo

satake-usa.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202630 issues · 73 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on satake-usa.com, 7 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s2.4 sMay 2Oct 172.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.5 s
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
88 ms65 msMay 2Sep 1975 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202680 ms
May 9, 202678 ms
May 16, 202683 ms
May 23, 202684 ms
May 30, 202679 ms
Jun 6, 202678 ms
Jun 13, 202678 ms
Jun 20, 202680 ms
Jun 27, 202680 ms
Jul 4, 202680 ms
Jul 11, 202675 ms
Jul 18, 202668 ms
Jul 25, 202671 ms
Aug 1, 202675 ms
Aug 8, 202677 ms
Aug 15, 202682 ms
Aug 22, 202681 ms
Aug 29, 202682 ms
Sep 5, 202685 ms
Sep 12, 202675 ms
Sep 19, 202675 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of satake-usa.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. satake-usa.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. satake-usa.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. satake-usa.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. satake-usa.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. satake-usa.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. satake-usa.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. satake-usa.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. satake-usa.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

4 to fix57
  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 89). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    550 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.

  • Font display

    450 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 55 KiB

    About 55 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    182 KiB

    2 images could be 182 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 79 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 292 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    23 KiB

    About 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 89 but mobile only 57. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 235 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 101 ms

    101 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 101 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    Your largest element takes 6.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Providing Processors And Conditionin…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.43

    0.43

    The layout shifts by 0.43 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 80 ms to 75 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 28 ms

    28 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 28 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix67
  • Page weight: 2.0 MB in 71 requests

    2.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 71 requests on a phone: images 1.5 MB (36), fonts 302 KiB (11) and scripts 177 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.58 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.58 g of CO₂e: 69.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7873
  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 19 text elements with low contrast

    19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

    ARIA input fields do not have accessible names (1 element).

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 32 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 10 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 14 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 10 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9295
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 89 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 89 pages on satake-usa.com and 5 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 141 characters

    Your meta description is 141 characters: “Satake manufactures food processing machinery for harvesting, milling, grading, optical sorting, to packing rice, wheat…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “THE WORLD LEADER INGRAIN PROCESSING, OPTICAL SORTING & MILLING”.

  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Optical Sorting & Processing - Rice, Wheat & Grains - Satake USA”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://satake-usa.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://satake-usa.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://satake-usa.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://satake-usa.com/product/beltuza, https://satake-usa.com/product/enpresor, https://satake-usa.com/product/nirami and https://satake-usa.com/product/vantage have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://satake-usa.com/request-product-info has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 43 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10092
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Only about 75 words

    The homepage has only about 75 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Request Product info”, “Contact” and “Learn More”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at satake-usa.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on satake-usa.com, including 12 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25