Website review, no card needed

schnell.it logo

schnell.it website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202645 issues · 92 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on schnell.it, 23 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.3 sMay 9Oct 241.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
107 ms91 msMay 9Oct 2493 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026102 ms
May 16, 2026104 ms
May 23, 2026102 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026100 ms
Jun 13, 202699 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202699 ms
Jul 4, 202698 ms
Jul 11, 2026104 ms
Jul 18, 2026104 ms
Jul 25, 2026104 ms
Aug 1, 2026105 ms
Aug 8, 202699 ms
Aug 15, 2026101 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 202694 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 2026102 ms
Sep 26, 2026102 ms
Oct 3, 202699 ms
Oct 10, 202698 ms
Oct 17, 202696 ms
Oct 24, 202693 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of schnell.it (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. schnell.it at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. schnell.it at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. schnell.it at 2.4 s2.4 s
  4. schnell.it at 3.2 s3.2 s
  5. schnell.it at 4.1 s4.1 s
  6. schnell.it at 4.9 s4.9 s
  7. schnell.it at 5.7 s5.7 s
  8. schnell.it at 6.5 s6.5 s

Speed

7 to fix53
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    11.6 s · 5.0 MB

    83 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.0 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.9 s

    18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 s · 1.3 MB

    13 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.5 s · 227 KiB

    About 227 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.5 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.5 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 83). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Minify CSS

    300 ms · 25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 28 KiB

    About 28 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 57 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Matomo, paginegialle.it and leadchampion.com and others), adding 116 KiB and 45 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify JavaScript

    15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 83 but mobile only 53. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 406 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 141 ms

    141 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 141 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.6 s

    18.6 s

    Your largest element takes 18.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.0 s

    19.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.6 s

    9.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.146

    0.146

    The layout shifts by 0.146 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 102 ms to 93 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 102 ms

    102 ms

    Real visitors wait 102 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.05

    0.05

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 794 ms

    794 ms

    Real visitors wait 794 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 35% faster for real visitors

    -35%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 4 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 5.1 MB in 94 requests

    5.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 94 requests on a phone: images 4.2 MB (38), scripts 360 KiB (29) and stylesheets 277 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (496 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (496 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.45 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.45 g of CO₂e: 174.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 6978
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Input buttons must have discernible text (1 element)

    Input buttons must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 14 tap targets too small

    14 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Inline text spacing must be adjustable with custom stylesheets (1 element)

    Inline text spacing must be adjustable with custom stylesheets: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 10 images without alt text

    10 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 16 links without text

    16 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (4 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 31 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 13 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9283
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (1336 characters)

    Your meta description is 1336 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.schnell.it/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 85 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 85 pages on schnell.it and 20 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Il gruppo Schnell nel mondo”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “SCHNELL GROUP | REINFORCEMENT PROCESSING EQUIPMENT”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.schnell.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (709 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix50
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.schnell.it/it/Prodotti/macchine-per-la-produzione-di-reti-e-trafile, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 1 page without a title

    https://www.schnell.it/supportit has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.schnell.it/supportit has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.schnell.it/sustainability/it and https://www.schnell.it/awm/it use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.schnell.it/sustainability/it and https://www.schnell.it/supportit have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.schnell.it/it/Azienda/Gruppo-Schnell-nel-mondo and https://www.schnell.it/it/Azienda/Milestones took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 59 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 9263
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.schnell.it/images/logo_new_schnell.png.

  • 22 small tap targets

    22 of 52 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.

  • 3 low-resolution images

    3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 709 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 709 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Matomo.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at schnell.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Matomo
Hosting
Aruba

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on schnell.it, including 13 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25