Website review, no card needed

screen-spe.com logo

screen-spe.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202641 issues · 82 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on screen-spe.com, 20 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.5 s3.3 sMay 2Oct 174.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.1 s
May 9, 20264.1 s
May 16, 20263.9 s
May 23, 20263.9 s
May 30, 20263.8 s
Jun 6, 20263.7 s
Jun 13, 20263.7 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.7 s
Jul 11, 20263.6 s
Jul 18, 20263.7 s
Jul 25, 20263.6 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.6 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.9 s
Sep 12, 20264.2 s
Sep 19, 20264.1 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.4 s
Oct 10, 20264.1 s
Oct 17, 20264.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
85 ms68 msMay 2Oct 383 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202678 ms
May 9, 202679 ms
May 16, 202676 ms
May 23, 202676 ms
May 30, 202676 ms
Jun 6, 202674 ms
Jun 13, 202678 ms
Jun 20, 202670 ms
Jun 27, 202678 ms
Jul 4, 202677 ms
Jul 11, 202681 ms
Jul 18, 202683 ms
Jul 25, 202677 ms
Aug 1, 202676 ms
Aug 8, 202674 ms
Aug 15, 202677 ms
Aug 22, 202678 ms
Aug 29, 202674 ms
Sep 12, 202672 ms
Sep 19, 202672 ms
Sep 26, 202678 ms
Oct 3, 202683 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of screen-spe.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. screen-spe.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. screen-spe.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. screen-spe.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. screen-spe.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. screen-spe.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. screen-spe.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  7. screen-spe.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  8. screen-spe.com at 4.1 s4.1 s

Speed

7 to fix62
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    21.3 s · 4.9 MB

    30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.9 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    17.1 s · 3.4 MB

    7 images could be 3.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 17.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.8 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.8 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.0 s · 357 KiB

    About 357 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 72). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Minify CSS

    310 ms · 57 KiB

    57 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    310 ms · 49 KiB

    About 49 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (jQuery CDN), adding 36 KiB and 25 ms of main-thread time.

  • Document request latency

    17 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 96 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Real visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.2 s

    24.2 s

    Your largest element takes 24.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.5 s

    24.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 78 ms to 83 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 78 ms

    78 ms

    Real visitors wait 78 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 5.0 MB in 33 requests

    5.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 33 requests on a phone: images 4.4 MB (13), stylesheets 391 KiB (8) and scripts 152 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 3.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    1.5 MB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example sp_SEUS_Web_GDimage.jpg at 1,827 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.5 MB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (3.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.41 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.41 g of CO₂e: 169.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 6 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 7762
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (26 characters)

    Your title is only 26 characters: “Home | SCREEN SPE USA, LLC”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“SCREEN SPE USA, LLC”, “NEWS” and “PRODUCTS”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.screen-spe.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at screen-spe.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 25 internal links, 27 external

    The homepage links to 25 pages on screen-spe.com and 27 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.screen-spe.com/us.

AI search readiness

1 to fix81
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (321 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 10 pages without a meta description

    /us/company, /us/careers, /us/contact, /kr, /tw and /sg and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /us/sitemap has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 6 pages slow to respond

    /us/company, /us/careers, /kr, /tw, /us/sitemap and /us/privacy_se-2-1 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 12 internal pages checked

    We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    10 pages of 12 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 11 small tap targets

    11 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix50
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 226 words

    The homepage has only about 226 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at screen-spe.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on screen-spe.com, including 16 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25