Website review, no card needed
screen-spe.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202641 issues · 82 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on screen-spe.com, 20 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 78 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 76 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 76 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 74 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 83 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.6 s
2.1 s
2.6 s
3.1 s
3.6 s
4.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
21.3 s · 4.9 MB30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.9 MB).
Improve image delivery
17.1 s · 3.4 MB7 images could be 3.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 17.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.8 s14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.8 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.0 s · 357 KiBAbout 357 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 72). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Minify CSS
310 ms · 57 KiB57 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Reduce unused JavaScript
310 ms · 49 KiBAbout 49 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (jQuery CDN), adding 36 KiB and 25 ms of main-thread time.
Document request latency
17 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.6 s
A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 96 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.2 s
24.2 sYour largest element takes 24.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 24.5 s
24.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.9 s
5.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 78 ms to 83 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 78 ms
78 msReal visitors wait 78 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.0 MB in 33 requests
5.0 MBYour homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 33 requests on a phone: images 4.4 MB (13), stylesheets 391 KiB (8) and scripts 152 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images over 500 KB
4 images weigh 3.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
1.5 MB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example sp_SEUS_Web_GDimage.jpg at 1,827 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.5 MB.
4 images in older formats
4 images (3.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.41 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.41 g of CO₂e: 169.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 6 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (26 characters)
Your title is only 26 characters: “Home | SCREEN SPE USA, LLC”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
6 H1 headlines
There are 6 <h1> headlines (“SCREEN SPE USA, LLC”, “NEWS” and “PRODUCTS”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.screen-spe.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at screen-spe.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
25 internal links, 27 external
The homepage links to 25 pages on screen-spe.com and 27 external pages.
1 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.screen-spe.com/us.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (321 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
10 pages without a meta description
/us/company, /us/careers, /us/contact, /kr, /tw and /sg and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page with very little text
/us/sitemap has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
6 pages slow to respond
/us/company, /us/careers, /kr, /tw, /us/sitemap and /us/privacy_se-2-1 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
12 internal pages checked
We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
10 pages of 12 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
11 small tap targets
11 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 226 words
The homepage has only about 226 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 other company contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at screen-spe.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on screen-spe.com, including 16 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.