Website review, no card needed

screenup.eu logo

screenup.eu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202618 issues · 62 checks

This review found 18 issues worth fixing on screenup.eu, 7 of them high impact, across 62 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 10.5 MB in 74 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s1.0 sMay 16Oct 311.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Oct 31, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
276 ms119 msMay 23Oct 31137 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026164 ms
May 30, 2026164 ms
Jun 6, 2026171 ms
Jun 13, 2026146 ms
Jun 20, 2026143 ms
Jun 27, 2026141 ms
Jul 4, 2026137 ms
Jul 11, 2026154 ms
Jul 18, 2026169 ms
Aug 8, 2026152 ms
Aug 15, 2026258 ms
Aug 22, 2026232 ms
Aug 29, 2026230 ms
Sep 5, 2026242 ms
Sep 12, 2026160 ms
Sep 19, 2026151 ms
Sep 26, 2026144 ms
Oct 3, 2026153 ms
Oct 10, 2026153 ms
Oct 17, 2026158 ms
Oct 24, 2026180 ms
Oct 31, 2026137 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of screenup.eu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. screenup.eu at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. screenup.eu at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. screenup.eu at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. screenup.eu at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. screenup.eu at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. screenup.eu at 3.1 s3.1 s
  7. screenup.eu at 3.6 s3.6 s
  8. screenup.eu at 4.1 s4.1 s

Speed

2 to fix100
  • Improve image delivery

    4.1 MB

    48 images could be 4.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.9 MB

    59 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.9 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    100 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 100 ms.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 100

    100/100

    Your mobile performance score is 100. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 18 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 175 ms

    175 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 175 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

1 to fix100
  • 96 images without width and height

    96 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 164 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

13 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 130 ms

    130 ms

    Real visitors wait 130 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 245 ms

    245 ms

    Real visitors wait 245 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 29% faster for real visitors

    -29%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.048

    0.048

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.048, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Speed Index: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.1 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The page is fully interactive after 1.1 s.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 10.5 MB in 74 requests

    10.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.5 MB in 74 requests on a phone: images 5.9 MB (64), media 3.9 MB (3) and fonts 751 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 24 images far larger than shown

    2.5 MB

    24 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example WTT.png at 3,012 px wide, shown at 140 px. Resized copies would save about 2.5 MB.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    jumbo.png weighs 760 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 38 images in older formats

    38 images (4.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 7 images below the first screen load straight away

    7 images further down the page (2.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.98 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.98 g of CO₂e: 358.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8591
  • Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (11 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (14 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 21 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 36 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10089
  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Elevatethe fan experience.”, “Engage.Entertain.Elevate.” and “Fromspectatorto participant.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization, SoftwareApplication and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “SoftwareApplication: no offers (price) block”.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 160 characters

    Your meta description is 160 characters: “ScreenUp turns crowd energy into measurable revenue. 65+ engagement modules, real-time data, sponsor monetization. The …”.

  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “ScreenUp - Every Empty Seat Costs You Money”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://screenup.eu/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://screenup.eu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,068 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9674
  • 9 broken images

    9 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://screenup.eu/assets/references/slide3.webp.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 855 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 855 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book a demo →”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Get a demo →” and “Book a demo →”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks and a star rating.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 8 email links.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at screenup.eu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
OVHcloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 18 issues on screenup.eu, including 3 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25