Website review, no card needed
securityscorecard.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202634 issues · 90 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on securityscorecard.com, 10 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 96.7 MB in 149 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for SecurityScorecard
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among SaaS websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 182 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 190 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 222 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
securityscorecard.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 283 KiBAbout 283 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
900 ms · 4.7 MB6 images could be 4.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
950 ms · 223 KiB5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (223 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (VWO, Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot and others), adding 755 KiB and 752 ms of main-thread time.
VWO adds 558 ms
558 msVWO costs a phone 558 ms of main-thread work and 272 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
360 ms · 85 KiBAbout 85 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 360 ms faster on a phone.
2,977 HTML elements
The page has 2,977 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 27.1 s
27.1 sYour largest element takes 27.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide s…”.
Time to Interactive: 28.9 s
28.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.5 s
10.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s
4.2 sThe first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 182 ms to 222 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
28 images without width and height
28 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 296 ms
296 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 296 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 172 ms
172 msReal visitors wait 172 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.008
0.008The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.008, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 96.7 MB in 149 requests
96.7 MBYour homepage downloads 96.7 MB in 149 requests on a phone: media 88.7 MB (29), images 7.0 MB (64) and scripts 848 KiB (27). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
TITANAI_Platform_Oct26_v1-SQUARE.gif weighs 4.4 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images in older formats
5 images (4.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (4.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images far larger than shown
294 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example SSC_Web_FooterCTA-AVD.png at 1,460 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 294 KiB.
About 27.4 g of CO₂ per visit
27.42 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 27.42 g of CO₂e: 3290.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 78 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
233 internal links, 28 external
The homepage links to 233 pages on securityscorecard.com and 28 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Protect your supply chain and manage third-party cyber risk with SecurityScorecard. Trusted by 25,000+ organizations fo…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Your end to end TPRM solution”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “SecurityScorecard | Supply Chain & Third-Party Risk Platform”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://securityscorecard.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://securityscorecard.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,665 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (19 KiB, 28 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /resources/press/securityscorecard-unveils-titan-ai-a-new-era-of-threat-informed-third-party-risk-management, whose canonical is /company/press/securityscorecard-unveils-titan-ai-a-new-era-of-threat-informed-third-party-risk-management. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
/request-a-demo has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 92 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken link to your own pages
1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://securityscorecard.com/aviation/ (404).
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (securityscorecard.com).
Valid certificate (75 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for securityscorecard.com and is valid for another 75 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://securityscorecard.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
securityscorecard.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
3 checks passed
Domain is 24 years old
24 yearssecurityscorecard.com was registered in May 2002 through Amazon Registrar, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
DNSSEC is on
securityscorecard.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.
Registered until May 2027
securityscorecard.com is registered until May 2027.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 71 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 1,303 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,303 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start free trial”.
29 calls to action
The homepage has 29 calls to action, for example “Book a demo”, “Start for free” and “Pricing”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:securityscorecard.com._nspf.vali.email include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email include:mktomail…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- 1 plugin is behind its latest release.gtranslate 3.1.2 → 5.0.2
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Hiring
- Hiring
- 11 open roles
- Teams
- Marketing (3), Technology (3), Revenue (2), Customer Success (1)
- Job board
- greenhouse
Company
- Employees
- 233
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on securityscorecard.com, including 21 speed issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.