Website review, no card needed
serlinolab.it website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202632 issues · 78 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on serlinolab.it, 10 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77C- #52,872 of 94,355 reviewed websitesbeats 39%
- #32,573 of 50,625 online storesbeats 31%
- #30,851 of 45,760 Shopify storesbeats 28%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 232 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 284 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 289 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 293 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 292 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 293 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 286 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 64
64/100Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
470 ms · 279 KiBAbout 279 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 470 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, alia-prod.com and Shopify and others), adding 1.6 MB and 507 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 261 KiB19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (261 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
310 ms · 62 KiBAbout 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,703 HTML elements
The page has 2,703 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Shopify adds 62 ms
62 msShopify costs a phone 62 ms of main-thread work and 967 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 83 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
39 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 39 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Improve image delivery
9 KiB1 image could be 9 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 84 ms
84 msYour server sent the HTML in 84 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 604 ms
604 msReal visitors wait 604 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.2 s
17.2 sYour largest element takes 17.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 25.4 s
25.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.2 s
8.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors
+21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 232 ms to 286 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
26 images without width and height
26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 344 ms
344 msReal visitors wait 344 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 28 ms
28 msScripts block the page for only 28 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.4 MB in 298 requests
4.4 MBYour homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 298 requests on a phone: fonts 1.8 MB (9), scripts 1.2 MB (132) and other files 882 KiB (127). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
square-web_optimized_434b56ea-ab13-4455-82a6-7f7877006834.we weighs 1,017 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images in older formats
4 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (1,017 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.23 g of CO₂e: 148.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 57 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 2 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (231 characters)
Your meta description is 231 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
38 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 38 pages on serlinolab.it and 6 external pages.
7 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “SerlinoLab”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “OMNIS Uomo diventa SERLINOLAB | Sito Ufficiale – SerlinoLab”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://serlinolab.it/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://serlinolab.it/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (887 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://serlinolab.it/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://serlinolab.it/pages/storia-del-serlinolab, https://serlinolab.it/policies/privacy-policy and https://serlinolab.it/policies/terms-of-service have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 pages without an H1
https://serlinolab.it/products/kit-completo-uomo, https://serlinolab.it/products/skincare-set-definitivo, https://serlinolab.it/products/kit-maxi, https://serlinolab.it/products/kit-giorno-notte, https://serlinolab.it/pages/storia-del-serlinolab and https://serlinolab.it/products/crema-viso-anti-eta-abbonamento and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
6 pages with very little text
https://serlinolab.it/products/kit-completo-uomo, https://serlinolab.it/products/skincare-set-definitivo, https://serlinolab.it/products/kit-maxi, https://serlinolab.it/products/kit-giorno-notte, https://serlinolab.it/products/crema-viso-anti-eta-abbonamento and https://serlinolab.it/products/contorno-occhi-abbonamento have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SOCKET_NOT_CONNECTED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 612 words of copy
The homepage carries about 612 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
8 short forms
8 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
28 cookies set on arrival
28Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
52 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 52 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at serlinolab.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 14 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Intelligems A B Testing · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Lai Product Reviews · Microsoft Clarity · Kaching Bundles · Gempages Builder · Triplewhale · Releasit Cod Fee · Gempages Cro · cloudfront.net · zoko.io · archive-digger.com · richpanel.com · trustpilot.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on serlinolab.it, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.