Website review, no card needed
sfweekly.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202647 issues · 98 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on sfweekly.com, 19 of them high impact, across 98 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
69DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 163 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.1 s
3.2 s
4.3 s
5.3 s
6.4 s
7.5 s
8.5 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.1 s · 2.8 MBAbout 2.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.0 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.0 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 11.5 s
A phone's processor spends 11.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 26
26/100Your mobile performance score is 26. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, mmvideocdn.com and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 4.8 MB and 3.6 s of main-thread time.
mmvideocdn.com adds 640 ms
640 msmmvideocdn.com costs a phone 640 ms of main-thread work and 767 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
588 KiB56 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (588 KiB).
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 494 ms
494 msOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 494 ms of main-thread work and 763 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 417 ms
417 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 417 ms of main-thread work and 742 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
JSDelivr CDN adds 305 ms
305 msJSDelivr CDN costs a phone 305 ms of main-thread work and 189 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,232 HTML elements
The page has 2,232 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 244 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 86 KiB9 images could be 86 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 49 KiBAbout 49 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
14 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 34 ms
34 msYour server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 7.9 s
7.9 sThe first text or image appears after 7.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.5 s
16.5 sYour largest element takes 16.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Fall gallery guide: Five can't-miss art shows in The City”.
Time to Interactive: 54.0 s
54.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 54.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.0 s
13.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.1 s
2.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.18
0.18For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 21% slower for real visitors
+21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 163 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 164 ms
164 msReal visitors wait 164 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.069
0.069The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.069, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.4 MB in 702 requests
7.4 MBYour homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 702 requests on a phone: scripts 5.0 MB (96), other files 817 KiB (369) and HTML 780 KiB (84). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
6aac66519e832.image.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.10 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.10 g of CO₂e: 251.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
13 text elements with low contrast
13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
12 tap targets too small
12 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (130 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 130 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Frames without titles
2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (10 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 110 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (12 characters)
Your title is only 12 characters: “sfweekly.com”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Structured data has 4 problems
Structured data found (Organization) but with 4 problems, for example “Organization: missing name”.
10 links crawlers can't follow
10 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
162 internal links, 24 external
The homepage links to 162 pages on sfweekly.com and 24 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.sfweekly.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sfweekly.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 3 AI answer engine crawlers
3 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.sfweekly.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (736 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
8 pages without a meta description
https://www.sfweekly.com/events, https://www.sfweekly.com/music, https://www.sfweekly.com/film, https://www.sfweekly.com/art, https://www.sfweekly.com/archives and https://www.sfweekly.com/our_partners and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 65 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 broken images
10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://s.ad.smaato.net/c/?adExInit=rev&redir=https%3A%2F%2Ftrends.revcontent.com%2Fcm%2Fpixel_sync%3Fbidder%3D176%26bidder_uid%3D%24UID%26exchange_uid%3D06e6b42e5a5b419281663236f8082235%26callback%3D.
65 third-party cookies
65 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.
13 distorted images
13 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
37 of 45 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 691 words of copy
The homepage carries about 691 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign Up”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Sign Up”, “Contact Us” and “Sign Up Today”.
5 short forms
5 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 50 testimonial or review blocks, 8 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
11 trackers load before any consent
11Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 6 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
23 cookies set on arrival
23Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
89 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 89 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sfweekly.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Company
- Founded
- 1980
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on sfweekly.com, including 22 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.