Website review, no card needed
sfsymphony.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202631 issues · 81 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on sfsymphony.org, 7 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 996 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 985 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 94 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 268 KiBAbout 268 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Mobile performance score: 66
66/100Your mobile performance score is 66. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 471 KiB9 images could be 471 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
570 ms · 140 KiBAbout 140 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 570 ms faster on a phone.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, Hotjar and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 1.8 MB and 354 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 78 KiB10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (78 KiB).
imgix adds 0 ms
0 msimgix costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 917 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
rsms.me adds 1 ms
1 msrsms.me costs a phone 1 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
270 ms · 34 KiB34 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 27 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 100 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.1 s
A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 562 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.3 s
16.3 sYour largest element takes 16.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 16.5 s
16.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.6 s
5.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
9 images without width and height
9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 79 ms
79 msReal visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 535 ms
535 msReal visitors wait 535 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 25% faster for real visitors
-25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 101 ms
101 msScripts block the page for only 101 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.046
0.046The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.046, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.0 MB in 77 requests
3.0 MBYour homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 77 requests on a phone: fonts 1.3 MB (11), images 930 KiB (22) and scripts 581 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (93 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.84 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.84 g of CO₂e: 101.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (3 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (29 characters)
Your title is only 29 characters: “San Francisco Symphony - Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.sfsymphony.org/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
95 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 95 pages on sfsymphony.org and 7 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 111 characters
Your meta description is 111 characters: “The San Francisco Symphony is among the most adventurous and innovative arts institutions in the United States.”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.sfsymphony.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (567 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://www.sfsymphony.org/Subscribe/Renewals, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
2 pages share a title
https://www.sfsymphony.org/Calendar and https://www.sfsymphony.org/calendar all use the title “San Francisco Symphony - Calendar”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
9 pages share a meta description
https://www.sfsymphony.org/Home/Help, https://www.sfsymphony.org/Calendar, https://www.sfsymphony.org/calendar, https://www.sfsymphony.org/Discover-the-Music/festival-pages/Films, https://www.sfsymphony.org/Buy-Tickets/Gift-Certificates and https://www.sfsymphony.org/Subscribe and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
8 pages without an H1
https://www.sfsymphony.org/Calendar, https://www.sfsymphony.org/Donate, https://www.sfsymphony.org/calendar, https://www.sfsymphony.org/Discover-the-Music/festival-pages/Holiday, https://www.sfsymphony.org/Discover-the-Music/festival-pages/Films and https://www.sfsymphony.org/Subscribe and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 62 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 405 words of copy
The homepage carries about 405 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Subscribe Now”, “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks and 2 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sfsymphony.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Employees
- 829
- Founded
- 1911
- Headquarters
- San Francisco
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on sfsymphony.org, including 14 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.