Website review, no card needed

shad.ca logo

shad.ca website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202648 issues · 93 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on shad.ca, 18 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s2.4 sMay 9Oct 243.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.6 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
242 ms103 msMay 9Oct 24216 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026125 ms
May 16, 2026127 ms
May 23, 2026128 ms
May 30, 2026130 ms
Jun 6, 2026130 ms
Jun 13, 2026124 ms
Jun 20, 2026119 ms
Jun 27, 2026120 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026121 ms
Jul 18, 2026122 ms
Jul 25, 2026122 ms
Aug 1, 2026121 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 15, 2026129 ms
Aug 22, 2026130 ms
Aug 29, 2026137 ms
Sep 5, 2026145 ms
Sep 12, 2026170 ms
Sep 19, 2026197 ms
Sep 26, 2026211 ms
Oct 3, 2026212 ms
Oct 10, 2026220 ms
Oct 17, 2026226 ms
Oct 24, 2026216 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of shad.ca (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. shad.ca at 1.6 s1.6 s
  2. shad.ca at 3.2 s3.2 s
  3. shad.ca at 4.8 s4.8 s
  4. shad.ca at 6.4 s6.4 s
  5. shad.ca at 8.0 s8.0 s
  6. shad.ca at 9.5 s9.5 s
  7. shad.ca at 11.1 s11.1 s
  8. shad.ca at 12.7 s12.7 s

Speed

12 to fix62
  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 1.4 MB

    4 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    39 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • 3,468 HTML elements

    The page has 3,468 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.0 MB

    About 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 88). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google CDN and others), adding 1.8 MB and 719 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 340 ms

    340 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 340 ms of main-thread work and 608 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 84 KiB

    About 84 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    309 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (309 KiB).

  • Google CDN adds 75 ms

    75 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 75 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Vimeo adds 34 ms

    34 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 34 ms of main-thread work and 522 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 192 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 88 but mobile only 62. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 30 ms

    30 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 30 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 15.4 s

    15.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.8 s

    18.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Your largest element takes 5.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image. Most of its time is resource load delay (7.3 s).

  • Real-user INP: 209 ms

    209 ms

    Real visitors wait 209 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 75% slower for real visitors

    +75%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 216 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 32% slower for real visitors

    +32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 266 ms

    266 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 266 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.043

    0.043

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.043, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 5.0 MB in 138 requests

    5.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 138 requests on a phone: images 2.6 MB (21), scripts 2.1 MB (48) and stylesheets 197 KiB (47). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    partners.jpg weighs 1.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    940 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example partners.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 412 px. Resized copies would save about 940 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (1.2 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.41 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.41 g of CO₂e: 169.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8590
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 24 text elements with low contrast

    24 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (42 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 42 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 67 links without text

    67 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 97 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9281
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (10 characters)

    Your title is only 10 characters: “About Shad”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 10 links with vague text

    10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 237 internal links, 68 external

    The homepage links to 237 pages on shad.ca and 68 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 77 characters

    Your meta description is 77 characters: “Shad is a registered Canadian charity and STEAM and entrepreneurship program.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.shad.ca/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.shad.ca/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.shad.ca/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,207 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix76
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.shad.ca/about declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.shad.ca/about all use the title “About Shad”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 13 pages share a meta description

    https://www.shad.ca/apply, https://www.shad.ca/participate, https://www.shad.ca/alumni, https://www.shad.ca/fr, https://www.shad.ca/participate/indigenous and https://www.shad.ca/impact and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 13 pages without an H1

    https://www.shad.ca/apply, https://www.shad.ca/participate, https://www.shad.ca/alumni, https://www.shad.ca/fr, https://www.shad.ca/participate/indigenous and https://www.shad.ca/impact and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 7 pages slow to respond

    https://www.shad.ca/fr, https://www.shad.ca/participate/indigenous, https://www.shad.ca/impact, https://www.shad.ca/about, https://www.shad.ca/leadership-team-and-board/rob-esselment and https://www.shad.ca/campuses and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 27 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5888
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 17 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 797 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 797 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Apply” and “Apply Now”.

  • 17 calls to action

    The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Apply”, “Apply Now” and “Learn More”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 21 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at shad.ca, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on shad.ca, including 25 speed issues and 3 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25