Website review, no card needed
shopevotech.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202644 issues · 87 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on shopevotech.com, 14 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80B- #41,748 of 105,269 reviewed websitesbeats 55%
- #27,508 of 59,124 online storesbeats 47%
- #26,458 of 53,876 Shopify storesbeats 44%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 145 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.7 s
2.3 s
2.9 s
3.5 s
4.0 s
4.6 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 236 KiBAbout 236 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 231 KiB9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (231 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, alia-prod.com and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 695 KiB and 639 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 345 KiB16 images could be 345 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 52 KiBAbout 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 268 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,644 HTML elements
The page has 1,644 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Render-blocking requests
200 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 200 ms.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 33 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 32.5 s
32.5 sYour largest element takes 32.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “- Halloween Sale - Up to 4 free screen protectors! FOR A LI…”.
Time to Interactive: 32.7 s
32.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.8 s
6.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors
+24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 116 ms to 145 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 31% slower for real visitors
+31%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 403 ms
403 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 403 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 166 ms
166 msReal visitors wait 166 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 684 ms
684 msReal visitors wait 684 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.6 MB in 197 requests
6.6 MBYour homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 197 requests on a phone: fonts 4.0 MB (7), scripts 872 KiB (57) and other files 841 KiB (106). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
home_banner_mobile_Halloween.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
5 images in older formats
5 images (639 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (44 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.86 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.86 g of CO₂e: 223.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (12 elements)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
12 tap targets too small
12 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (7 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (6 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (10 characters)
Your title is only 10 characters: “EvoTech US”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “3 in 1 Screen Protector - iPhone”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
56 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 56 pages on shopevotech.com and 4 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://shopevotech.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization, Product and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://shopevotech.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (930 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://shopevotech.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://shopevotech.com/collections/alle-produkte, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://shopevotech.com/collections/vip-collection is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
4 pages share 2 titles
/ and https://shopevotech.com/apps/track123 all use the title “EvoTech US”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
11 pages without a meta description
https://shopevotech.com/collections/best-sellers, https://shopevotech.com/pages/contact, https://shopevotech.com/pages/join-the-vip-club, https://shopevotech.com/collections/vip-collection, https://shopevotech.com/products/3-in-1-iphone and https://shopevotech.com/products/3-in-1-screen-protector and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
8 pages without an H1
https://shopevotech.com/collections/best-sellers, https://shopevotech.com/pages/contact, https://shopevotech.com/apps/track123, https://shopevotech.com/products/3-in-1-iphone, https://shopevotech.com/products/3-in-1-screen-protector and https://shopevotech.com/collections/screen-protector and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
About 685 words of copy
The homepage carries about 685 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
6 checks passed
16 calls to action
The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Track my order” and “Join the VIP club”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 29 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating, 12 trust badges and “123,000+ Happy Customers”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
22 cookies set on arrival
22Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at shopevotech.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 6 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Intelligems A B Testing · Triplewhale · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Bucks · Aftersell · loox.io
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on shopevotech.com, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.