Website review, no card needed

shopsps.com logo

shopsps.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202654 issues · 86 checks

This review found 54 issues worth fixing on shopsps.com, 22 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.2 s742 msApr 25Oct 105.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20261.4 s
May 2, 20261.4 s
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20264.5 s
Jun 6, 20264.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.9 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.2 s
Jul 4, 20264.3 s
Jul 11, 20264.7 s
Jul 18, 20264.8 s
Jul 25, 20264.9 s
Aug 1, 20264.9 s
Aug 8, 20264.8 s
Aug 15, 20264.9 s
Aug 22, 20264.9 s
Aug 29, 20264.9 s
Sep 5, 20264.9 s
Sep 12, 20265.0 s
Sep 19, 20265.3 s
Sep 26, 20265.3 s
Oct 3, 20265.6 s
Oct 10, 20265.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
138 ms61 msApr 25Oct 10129 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 202670 ms
May 2, 202670 ms
May 9, 202672 ms
May 16, 202678 ms
May 23, 202682 ms
May 30, 202696 ms
Jun 6, 202682 ms
Jun 13, 202684 ms
Jun 20, 202685 ms
Jul 4, 202697 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202696 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202696 ms
Aug 15, 2026100 ms
Aug 22, 2026101 ms
Aug 29, 2026102 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026104 ms
Sep 19, 2026112 ms
Sep 26, 2026113 ms
Oct 3, 2026127 ms
Oct 10, 2026129 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of shopsps.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. shopsps.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. shopsps.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. shopsps.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. shopsps.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. shopsps.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. shopsps.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. shopsps.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. shopsps.com at 4.5 s4.5 s

Speed

11 to fix10
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    19.2 s · 4.3 MB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.3 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    7.3 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 7.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.5 s · 695 KiB

    About 695 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 10

    10/100

    Your mobile performance score is 10 (desktop: 17). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 5,999 HTML elements

    The page has 5,999 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 5.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.3 MB

    57 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    900 ms · 195 KiB

    About 195 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Attentive and others), adding 589 KiB and 514 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 381 ms

    381 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 381 ms of main-thread work and 461 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 280 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 40 ms

    40 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 40 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

15 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Real visitors wait 6.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.86

    0.86

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.86 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 32.6 s

    32.6 s

    Your largest element takes 32.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We sell name-brand surgical disposables at a lower price. G…”.

  • Speed Index: 19.4 s

    19.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 19.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 39.9 s

    39.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 39.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.931

    0.931

    The layout shifts by 0.931 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 958 ms

    958 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 958 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 273 ms

    273 ms

    Real visitors wait 273 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 83% slower for real visitors

    +83%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 70 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 300% slower for real visitors

    +300%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 5.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 28 images without width and height

    28 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 8.6 MB in 172 requests

    8.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.6 MB in 172 requests on a phone: images 5.5 MB (106), other files 1.4 MB (42) and scripts 1.4 MB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.44 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.44 g of CO₂e: 292.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8187
  • Images must have alternative text (2 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Links must have discernible text (2 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Headings should not be empty (2 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8574
  • Title is long (80 characters)

    Your title is 80 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “The Largest Surgical Disposables Store Online | Surgical Product Solutions (SPS)”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“We Value Your Privacy”, “Subscribe to Our Newsletter” and “We sell name-brand surgical disposablesat a lower…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (269 characters)

    Your meta description is 269 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 47 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 47 pages on shopsps.com and 2 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.shopsps.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.shopsps.com/sitemap_www.shopsps.com_Index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.shopsps.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix71
  • 15 pages without a title

    https://www.shopsps.com/About%20Us, https://www.shopsps.com/manufacturer/galatea, https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes, https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes/sps-refurbished-arthroscopes, https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes/sps-refurbished-colonoscopes and https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes/sps-refurbished-cystoscopes and 9 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://www.shopsps.com/About%20Us, https://www.shopsps.com/manufacturer/galatea, https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes, https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes/sps-refurbished-arthroscopes, https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes/sps-refurbished-colonoscopes and https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes/sps-refurbished-cystoscopes and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.shopsps.com/About%20Us, https://www.shopsps.com/manufacturer/galatea, https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes, https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes/sps-refurbished-arthroscopes, https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes/sps-refurbished-colonoscopes and https://www.shopsps.com/sps-refurbished-scopes/sps-refurbished-cystoscopes and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 13 small tap targets

    13 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • A 16-field form

    Your longest form asks for 16 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • Only about 111 words

    The homepage has only about 111 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop by Category” and “Shop by Manufacturer”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Shop My Wishlist”, “Contact Us” and “Shop by Category”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at shopsps.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 54 issues on shopsps.com, including 26 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25