Website review, no card needed

sienna-im.com logo

sienna-im.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202640 issues · 88 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on sienna-im.com, 13 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.5 sMay 16Oct 312.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Oct 31, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
119 ms83 msMay 16Oct 31101 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026112 ms
May 23, 2026104 ms
May 30, 202699 ms
Jun 6, 202694 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202689 ms
Jun 27, 2026105 ms
Jul 4, 2026112 ms
Jul 11, 2026115 ms
Jul 18, 2026114 ms
Jul 25, 2026101 ms
Aug 1, 2026105 ms
Aug 8, 2026102 ms
Sep 19, 2026103 ms
Sep 26, 2026103 ms
Oct 3, 202693 ms
Oct 10, 202698 ms
Oct 17, 202688 ms
Oct 24, 2026100 ms
Oct 31, 2026101 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sienna-im.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sienna-im.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. sienna-im.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. sienna-im.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. sienna-im.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. sienna-im.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. sienna-im.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  7. sienna-im.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  8. sienna-im.com at 4.4 s4.4 s

Speed

8 to fix61
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 61

    61/100

    Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    600 ms · 182 KiB

    6 images could be 182 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    340 ms · 427 KiB

    About 427 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 340 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.0 MB and 630 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 434 ms

    434 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 434 ms of main-thread work and 736 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    340 ms · 89 KiB

    About 89 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 340 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 170 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    26 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Your largest element takes 5.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Pexels Felix Antoine Coutu 174902 29591147”. Most of its time is resource load delay (2.7 s).

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 293 ms

    293 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 293 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 101 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.011

    0.011

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.011, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.3 MB in 52 requests

    2.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 52 requests on a phone: scripts 1.0 MB (18), images 685 KiB (14) and other files 354 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (300 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (123 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.64 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.64 g of CO₂e: 77.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 8586
  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (4 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Links must have discernible text (4 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Hidden but focusable

    3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 7 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 11 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 36 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 36 pages on sienna-im.com and 7 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 138 characters

    Your meta description is 138 characters: “Sienna Investment Managers (Sienna IM) provides support to companies and individuals that want to see a sustainable and…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Sienna Gestion”.

  • Title: 44 characters

    Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Delivering innovative solutions with purpose”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.sienna-im.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sienna-im.com/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Some text only appears after JavaScript runs

    42%

    The HTML your server sends has 585 of the 1,389 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.sienna-im.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details; logo would complete it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.sienna-im.com/news and https://www.sienna-im.com/news/17275 all use the title “News | Sienna Investment Managers”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.sienna-im.com/news and https://www.sienna-im.com/news/17275 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.sienna-im.com/securiser-lavenir-il-ny-a-pas-de-durabilite-sans-paix-et-pas-de-paix-sans-capacite-a-la-defense, whose canonical is https://www.sienna-im.com/sovereignty-defense-strategy. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    https://www.sienna-im.com/expertises, https://www.sienna-im.com/services/listed-assets, https://www.sienna-im.com/services/private-credit, https://www.sienna-im.com/services/hybrid-assets and https://www.sienna-im.com/securiser-lavenir-il-ny-a-pas-de-durabilite-sans-paix-et-pas-de-paix-sans-capacite-a-la-defense took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://use.typekit.net/fja5lda.css' violates the following Content Security Policy directive: "connect-…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix69
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 1,389 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,389 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Join us”, “Contact” and “Contact us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sienna-im.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
OVHcloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on sienna-im.com, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25