Website review, no card needed
simius.tokyo website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202636 issues · 82 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on simius.tokyo, 14 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: hcaptcha.com adds 2.3 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79C- #42,122 of 93,360 reviewed websitesbeats 49%
- #26,344 of 49,861 online storesbeats 41%
- #25,145 of 45,016 Shopify storesbeats 38%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 211 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 214 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 236 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
hcaptcha.com adds 2.3 s
2.3 shcaptcha.com costs a phone 2.3 s of main-thread work and 3.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Mobile performance score: 38
38/100Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.3 s
A phone's processor spends 7.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (hcaptcha.com, Google Tag Manager and Google CDN and others), adding 5.1 MB and 3.3 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
650 ms · 335 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (335 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 133 KiBAbout 133 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 321 ms
321 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 321 ms of main-thread work and 736 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 321 ms
321 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 321 ms of main-thread work and 326 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 265 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
LoyaltyLion adds 50 ms
50 msLoyaltyLion costs a phone 50 ms of main-thread work and 360 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 25 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 25 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
41 KiB3 images could be 41 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify CSS
20 KiB20 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 13 ms
13 msYour server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 36.2 s
36.2 sYour largest element takes 36.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 20.1 s
20.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 20.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 71.4 s
71.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 71.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s
1.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 211 ms to 236 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 186 ms
186 msReal visitors wait 186 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 799 ms
799 msReal visitors wait 799 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 13.3 MB in 327 requests
13.3 MBYour homepage downloads 13.3 MB in 327 requests on a phone: fonts 6.0 MB (25), scripts 4.4 MB (95) and HTML 1.3 MB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 3.8 g of CO₂ per visit
3.78 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.78 g of CO₂e: 453.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
10 text elements with low contrast
10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
12 form fields without a label
12 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 26 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
50 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 50 pages on simius.tokyo and 5 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 71 characters
Your meta description is 71 characters: “SIMIUS ( シミウス ) は、シンプルかつ効果的なスキンケアを追求するブランドで、シミ と エイジングケア に特化した化粧品シリーズです”.
Title: 51 characters
Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “シミ と エイジングケア SIMIUS ( シミウス ) シリーズ 公式通販 – SIMIUS公式通販”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://simius.tokyo/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://simius.tokyo/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://simius.tokyo/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages without a meta description
https://simius.tokyo/collections/all, https://simius.tokyo/collections/outlet, https://simius.tokyo/blogs/beauty-navi/tagged/%E7%BE%8E%E8%82%8C-%E3%82%B7%E3%83%9F-%E3%81%8F%E3%81%99%E3%81%BF and https://simius.tokyo/blogs/beauty-navi/tagged/%E7%B4%AB%E5%A4%96%E7%B7%9A%E5%AF%BE%E7%AD%96 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://simius.tokyo/blogs/beauty-navi/tagged/%E7%BE%8E%E8%82%8C-%E3%82%B7%E3%83%9F-%E3%81%8F%E3%81%99%E3%81%BF, whose canonical is https://simius.tokyo/blogs/beauty-navi/tagged/%e7%be%8e%e8%82%8c-%e3%82%b7%e3%83%9f-%e3%81%8f%e3%81%99%e3%81%bf. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
3 pages without an H1
https://simius.tokyo/collections/all, https://simius.tokyo/blogs/beauty-navi/tagged/%E7%BE%8E%E8%82%8C-%E3%82%B7%E3%83%9F-%E3%81%8F%E3%81%99%E3%81%BF and https://simius.tokyo/blogs/beauty-navi/tagged/%E7%B4%AB%E5%A4%96%E7%B7%9A%E5%AF%BE%E7%AD%96 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
14 pages with very little text
https://simius.tokyo/collections/outlet, https://simius.tokyo/pages/guide, https://simius.tokyo/collections/simius, https://simius.tokyo/products/subscription, https://simius.tokyo/products/uv-serum-ex and https://simius.tokyo/products/lotion-ex and 8 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 27 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Protected Audience API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “[hCaptcha] Rate limited or network error. Please retry.”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
17 of 17 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Only about 27 words
The homepage has only about 27 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
43 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 43 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at simius.tokyo, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 6 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Loyalty Rewards And Referrals · Crazy Egg · Helium Customer Fields · Microsoft Clarity · Subscription Test · amp-cdn.tokyo
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on simius.tokyo, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.