Website review, no card needed
simbioplus.hu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202638 issues · 83 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on simbioplus.hu, 11 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76C- #66,808 of 108,938 reviewed websitesbeats 34%
- #42,931 of 61,775 online storesbeats 26%
- #40,752 of 56,370 Shopify storesbeats 23%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 139 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.6 s · 766 KiB12 images could be 766 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
910 ms · 914 KiBAbout 914 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 910 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Google Tag Manager and Mailchimp and others), adding 2.6 MB and 650 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
471 KiB21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (471 KiB).
Shopify adds 259 ms
259 msShopify costs a phone 259 ms of main-thread work and 1.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
2,655 HTML elements
The page has 2,655 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google Tag Manager adds 153 ms
153 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 153 ms of main-thread work and 310 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 198 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
26 KiBAbout 26 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Minify JavaScript
10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Duplicated JavaScript
1 KiB1 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
1 checks passed
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.6 s
10.6 sYour largest element takes 10.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Untitled_1400_x_1400_px_-2”.
Time to Interactive: 22.3 s
22.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.0 s
7.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 26% slower for real visitors
+26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 335 ms
335 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 335 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
21 images without width and height
21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 139 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 95 ms
95 msReal visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 641 ms
641 msReal visitors wait 641 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.093
0.093The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.093, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.4 MB in 339 requests
4.4 MBYour homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 339 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (100), other files 1.3 MB (170) and images 981 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images far larger than shown
769 KiB10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Immunrendszer-Tamogato-Csomag.webp at 2,048 px wide, shown at 202 px. Resized copies would save about 769 KiB.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Copy_of_Untitled_1400_x_1400_px_1400_x_1000_px_-3.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (832 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
3 images in older formats
3 images (424 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.23 g of CO₂e: 148.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
14 links without text
14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (14 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (70 characters)
Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Anyatej oligoszacharidok és prebiotikus rostok a bélflóra egészségéért”.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Érzékeny emésztés, visszatérő panaszok? Kezdje a …” and “Egészségügyi videótár”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (206 characters)
Your meta description is 206 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("https:files/SimbioPlus_emblema_fekvo_color_m_szlogennel…”.
115 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 115 pages on simbioplus.hu and 5 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://simbioplus.hu/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://simbioplus.hu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,180 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://simbioplus.hu/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
5 pages without an H1
https://simbioplus.hu/collections/osszes-termek, https://simbioplus.hu/pages/vasarloi-visszajelzesek, https://simbioplus.hu/blogs/tudasbazis, https://simbioplus.hu/pages/rolunk-irtak-osszes and https://simbioplus.hu/pages/gyakran-ismetelt-kerdesek-1 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages slow to respond
https://simbioplus.hu/pages/orvosok-mondjak, https://simbioplus.hu/blogs/tudasbazis, https://simbioplus.hu/products/simbioplus-enterovit and https://simbioplus.hu/products/fiber-pectin-kimeletes-rost-az-emesztesnek took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
15 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 123 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,731 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,731 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
15 cookies set on arrival
15Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at simbioplus.hu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 18 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Pandectes Gdpr · Sami Wholesale · Pickupbird By Digiloop · Releasit Cod Fee · Triplewhale · Essential Announcer · Planet Discounts Upsells · Ecomposer Builder · Judge Me Reviews · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Essential Announcement Bar · Planetdataset App · Digiloop Pickup Delivery · Mailchimp · Order Value Booster · Essential Post Purchase Upsell · Essential Icon Badge Banners · chimpstatic.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on simbioplus.hu, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.