Website review, no card needed
sizebay.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202625 issues · 69 checks
This review found 25 issues worth fixing on sizebay.com, 5 of them high impact, across 69 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
84BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 151 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 156 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 161 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 158 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 241 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 75
75/100Your mobile performance score is 75 (desktop: 95). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
600 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 73 KiB2 images could be 73 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 25 KiBAbout 25 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 21 KiBAbout 21 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 75 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.9 s
A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 274 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 209 ms
209 msYour server sent the HTML in 209 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.1 s
7.1 sYour largest element takes 7.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 7.4 s
7.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 7.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user INP: 231 ms
231 msReal visitors wait 231 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 54% slower for real visitors
+54%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 151 ms to 241 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 31% faster for real visitors
-31%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 2.5 s
2.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.5 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 2 ms
2 msScripts block the page for only 2 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
9 images far larger than shown
919 KiB9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example how-to-prepare-your-fashion-e-commerce-store-for-black-frida at 1,920 px wide, shown at 270 px. Resized copies would save about 919 KiB.
13 images below the first screen load straight away
13 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
6 images in older formats
6 images (832 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.54 g of CO₂e: 64.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 1.9 MB in 38 requests
1.9 MBYour homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 38 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (20), fonts 136 KiB (3) and scripts 86 KiB (6). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
22 links without text
22 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 71 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
56 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 56 pages on sizebay.com and 6 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 135 characters
Your meta description is 135 characters: “AI-driven solutions for measurable fashion e-commerce growth. Elevate your customer experience to maximize sales and bo…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Sizebay”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Sizebay | By fashion experts, for fashion e-commerce”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://sizebay.com/en/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sizebay.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://sizebay.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://sizebay.com/en/virtual-try-on and https://sizebay.com/en/virtual-fitting-room all use the title “Virtual try-on | The size recommendation tool for your e-commerce”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://sizebay.com/en/fashion-hub and https://sizebay.com/en/about have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://sizebay.com/en/virtual-try-on and https://sizebay.com/en/virtual-fitting-room use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://sizebay.com/en/blog, whose canonical is https://sizebay.com/en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://sizebay.com/en/blog has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 small tap targets
10 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 137 words
The homepage has only about 137 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “VIRTUAL TRY-ON”.
17 calls to action
The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Virtual try-on”, “Schedule a Demo” and “Get a Demo”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 4 email links.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sizebay.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 25 issues on sizebay.com, including 10 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.