Website review, no card needed
skyelectric.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202646 issues · 89 checks
This review found 46 issues worth fixing on skyelectric.com, 19 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 6.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 6.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 7.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 7.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 7.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 142 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 142 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 140 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
1.9 s
2.9 s
3.8 s
4.8 s
5.8 s
6.7 s
7.7 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
14.5 s · 10.2 MB134 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10.2 MB).
Render-blocking requests
5.5 s31 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.5 s.
Reduce unused CSS
3.1 s · 629 KiBAbout 629 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 315 KiBAbout 315 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
1.1 s · 624 KiB6 images could be 624 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Main-thread work: 3.4 s
A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 969 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,059 HTML elements
The page has 2,059 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 33 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 32 KiB32 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 105 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Fonts and wpforms.com), adding 69 KiB and 5 ms of main-thread time.
Minify JavaScript
12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 29 ms
29 msYour server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 9.8 s
9.8 sReal visitors wait 9.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 6.0 s
6.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 6.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.8 s
23.8 sYour largest element takes 23.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 24.6 s
24.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 15.3 s
15.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.4 s
5.4 sThe first text or image appears after 5.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 142 ms to 140 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.4 s to 7.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 163 ms
163 msReal visitors wait 163 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 89 ms
89 msScripts block the page for only 89 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.3 MB in 141 requests
10.3 MBYour homepage downloads 10.3 MB in 141 requests on a phone: images 5.2 MB (55), media 2.9 MB (1) and scripts 1.1 MB (42). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (916 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
4 images in older formats
4 images (685 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit
2.92 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.92 g of CO₂e: 349.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
6 dropdowns have no label.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
12 text elements with low contrast
12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (59 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 59 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
11 form fields without a label
11 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 55 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“SkyElectric Unveils “SkyOne” Smart Solar Range, E…”, “10 Steps to Prepare for Solar Panel” and “Businesses Are Cutting Costs with Commercial Solar”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
88 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 88 pages on skyelectric.com and 16 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 47 characters
Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “SkyElectric – The World's Smartest Solar System”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.skyelectric.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.skyelectric.com/wp-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.skyelectric.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,307 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
https://www.skyelectric.com/about-us, https://www.skyelectric.com/referral-program, https://www.skyelectric.com/blog, https://www.skyelectric.com/careers, https://www.skyelectric.com/skyhome and https://www.skyelectric.com/skydrive and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
14 pages without an H1
https://www.skyelectric.com/about-us, https://www.skyelectric.com/referral-program, https://www.skyelectric.com/careers, https://www.skyelectric.com/skyhome, https://www.skyelectric.com/skydrive and https://www.skyelectric.com/skywind and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
8 pages slow to respond
https://www.skyelectric.com/skyhome, https://www.skyelectric.com/skywind, https://www.skyelectric.com/skybizz, https://www.skyelectric.com/skybiz-utility-scale-solution, https://www.skyelectric.com/skyindus and https://www.skyelectric.com/industrial-grid-tied-solar-systems and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 27 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: “Trusted by 10,000+ Customers”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
A 11-field form
Your longest form asks for 11 fields (5 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 750 words of copy
The homepage carries about 750 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Learn More” and “Request a Meeting”.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at skyelectric.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 46 issues on skyelectric.com, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 7 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.