Website review, no card needed

slate.auto logo

slate.auto website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202645 issues · 90 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on slate.auto, 16 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.0 sMay 9Oct 242.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
287 ms146 msMay 9Oct 24205 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026254 ms
May 16, 2026244 ms
May 23, 2026261 ms
May 30, 2026261 ms
Jun 6, 2026269 ms
Jun 13, 2026271 ms
Jun 20, 2026264 ms
Jun 27, 2026182 ms
Jul 4, 2026168 ms
Jul 11, 2026162 ms
Jul 18, 2026162 ms
Jul 25, 2026166 ms
Aug 1, 2026171 ms
Aug 8, 2026172 ms
Aug 15, 2026166 ms
Aug 22, 2026162 ms
Aug 29, 2026164 ms
Sep 5, 2026171 ms
Sep 12, 2026182 ms
Sep 19, 2026192 ms
Sep 26, 2026198 ms
Oct 3, 2026203 ms
Oct 10, 2026204 ms
Oct 17, 2026204 ms
Oct 24, 2026205 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of slate.auto (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. slate.auto at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. slate.auto at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. slate.auto at 3.1 s3.1 s
  4. slate.auto at 4.2 s4.2 s
  5. slate.auto at 5.2 s5.2 s
  6. slate.auto at 6.3 s6.3 s
  7. slate.auto at 7.3 s7.3 s
  8. slate.auto at 8.4 s8.4 s

Speed

13 to fix37
  • Improve image delivery

    7.8 s · 2.2 MB

    10 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.0 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 MB

    About 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    863 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 863 ms on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 784 ms

    784 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 784 ms of main-thread work and 681 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Document request latency

    850 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 850 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 724 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    652 KiB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (652 KiB).

  • Facebook adds 389 ms

    389 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 389 ms of main-thread work and 282 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Server response: 963 ms

    963 ms

    Your server takes 963 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 55 KiB

    About 55 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    118 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 118 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    Your largest element takes 15.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 40.3 s

    40.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 40.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.5 s

    14.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 212 ms

    212 ms

    Real visitors wait 212 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 606 ms

    606 ms

    Real visitors wait 606 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 254 ms to 205 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.011

    0.011

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.011, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix36
  • Page weight: 13.9 MB in 265 requests

    13.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 13.9 MB in 265 requests on a phone: media 6.4 MB (2), scripts 4.0 MB (103) and images 2.7 MB (33). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    signature-wraps-not-cropped.gif weighs 555 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    26102SLATE_EXPLODED-HERO_v011_1400x800.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    412 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example signature-wraps-not-cropped.gif at 2,080 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 412 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (555 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (112 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.94 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.94 g of CO₂e: 472.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8894
  • 15 tap targets too small

    15 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 48 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9294
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 56 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 56 pages on slate.auto and 5 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 136 characters

    Your meta description is 136 characters: “Meet Slate—the affordable, all-electric truck that adapts to your life. SUV, work truck, or anything in between. It’s y…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “How A Slate Stacks Up”.

  • Title: 51 characters

    Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “Slate Auto | The Customizable EV That Works for You”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.slate.auto/en.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.slate.auto/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (732 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix74
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /en/specs is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    /en and / all use the title “Slate Auto | The Customizable EV That Works for You”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /preorder and /en/preorder use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is /en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    /en/specs, /en/charging, /en/fleet, /en/slate-u, /en/service and /en/store and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    /en/store and /en/store/featured have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    /en/service and /en/preorder took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7376
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187252918&Ver=2&mid=44880e4f-7cb2-470b-b5f9-f9571176c4c2&bo=1&sid=1879de20d65211f1b38ecf7df33cdc96&vid=1879fb30d65211f19d46631889af2930&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&l.

  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 631 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 631 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 23 calls to action

    The homepage has 23 calls to action, for example “Build & Shop”, “Start Designing” and “Shop the collab”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (7 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 27 cookies set on arrival

    27

    Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 44 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 44 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at slate.auto, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Vercel

Hiring

Hiring
4 open roles
Teams
Operations (2), Software Engineering (1), The Site (1)
Job board
lever

Company

Founded
2022
Headquarters
Troy

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on slate.auto, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25