Website review, no card needed

slate.com logo

slate.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202633 issues · 88 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on slate.com, 12 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.2 s1.1 sApr 18Oct 31.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.1 s
Apr 25, 20261.1 s
May 2, 20261.1 s
May 9, 20261.1 s
May 16, 20261.2 s
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.1 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
124 ms109 msApr 18Oct 3111 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026121 ms
Apr 25, 2026121 ms
May 2, 2026122 ms
May 9, 2026121 ms
May 16, 2026120 ms
May 23, 2026119 ms
May 30, 2026114 ms
Jun 6, 2026114 ms
Jun 13, 2026115 ms
Jun 20, 2026117 ms
Jun 27, 2026115 ms
Jul 4, 2026113 ms
Jul 11, 2026112 ms
Jul 18, 2026111 ms
Jul 25, 2026111 ms
Aug 1, 2026112 ms
Aug 8, 2026112 ms
Aug 15, 2026113 ms
Aug 22, 2026113 ms
Aug 29, 2026114 ms
Sep 5, 2026114 ms
Sep 12, 2026113 ms
Sep 19, 2026113 ms
Sep 26, 2026112 ms
Oct 3, 2026111 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of slate.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. slate.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. slate.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. slate.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. slate.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. slate.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. slate.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. slate.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. slate.com at 4.6 s4.6 s

Speed

10 to fix38
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.0 s · 860 KiB

    62 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (860 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 52). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 2.0 MB

    About 2.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Taboola, Google CDN and piano.io and others), adding 3.2 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.

  • Taboola adds 631 ms

    631 ms

    Taboola costs a phone 631 ms of main-thread work and 1,021 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 415 ms

    415 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 415 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • piano.io adds 217 ms

    217 ms

    piano.io costs a phone 217 ms of main-thread work and 450 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 152 ms

    152 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 152 ms of main-thread work and 304 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 243 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    185 KiB

    About 185 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    128 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 128 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Improve image delivery

    107 KiB

    2 images could be 107 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify JavaScript

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 26 ms

    26 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 26 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 45.5 s

    45.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 45.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    Your largest element takes 9.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 12.5 s

    12.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 111 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 97 ms

    97 ms

    Real visitors wait 97 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.6 s

    0.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 286 ms

    286 ms

    Real visitors wait 286 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.014

    0.014

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.014, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 6.3 MB in 584 requests

    6.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.3 MB in 584 requests on a phone: scripts 4.3 MB (92), other files 895 KiB (290) and fonts 414 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    46 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 3dc4bd4f-68a1-4235-954f-30a71fd60171.png at 680 px wide, shown at 173 px. Resized copies would save about 46 KiB.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.80 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.80 g of CO₂e: 215.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9193
  • 12 tap targets too small

    12 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 21 links without text

    21 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 29 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9289
  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“It’s Slate’s 30th Birthday!”, “Sign up for Your Morning Slate” and “Get the Latest Slate Advice Delivered To Your Inb…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Structured data has 3 problems

    Structured data found (NewsArticle) but with 3 problems, for example “NewsArticle: missing name”.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 182 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 182 pages on slate.com and 16 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “Online magazine of news, politics, technology, and culture. Combines humor and insight in thoughtful analyses of curren…”.

  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Slate Magazine - Politics, Business, Technology, and the Arts”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://slate.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://slate.com/sitemaps/sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,607 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without an H1

    /plus has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 102 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 3588
  • 39 third-party cookies

    39 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “3000ms timeout exceeded”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,551 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,551 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Slate Shop”, “Join Slate Plus” and “Sign Up”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Amplitude and LinkedIn Insight.

Privacy and tracking

  • 11 trackers load before any consent

    11

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Amplitude, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Tag Manager and 6 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 39 cookies set on arrival

    39

    Opening the homepage sets 39 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 68 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 68 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at slate.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on slate.com, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25