Website review, no card needed

smith-root.com logo

smith-root.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202642 issues · 68 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on smith-root.com, 19 of them high impact, across 68 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s1.9 sMay 16Oct 312.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Oct 31, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
98 ms59 msMay 16Oct 3193 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202663 ms
May 23, 202679 ms
May 30, 202671 ms
Jun 6, 202669 ms
Jun 13, 202665 ms
Jun 20, 202664 ms
Jun 27, 202668 ms
Jul 4, 202671 ms
Jul 11, 202692 ms
Jul 18, 202678 ms
Jul 25, 202672 ms
Aug 1, 202676 ms
Aug 8, 202670 ms
Aug 15, 202670 ms
Aug 22, 202670 ms
Aug 29, 202667 ms
Sep 5, 202670 ms
Sep 12, 202676 ms
Sep 19, 202670 ms
Sep 26, 202679 ms
Oct 3, 202679 ms
Oct 10, 202681 ms
Oct 17, 202688 ms
Oct 24, 202688 ms
Oct 31, 202693 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of smith-root.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. smith-root.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. smith-root.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. smith-root.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. smith-root.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. smith-root.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. smith-root.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. smith-root.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. smith-root.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix56
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    18.9 s · 3.5 MB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.5 MB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    5.7 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.4 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    6.5 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.5 s.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3.6 s · 703 KiB

    703 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Improve image delivery

    950 ms · 164 KiB

    3 images could be 164 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 950 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and Google Fonts and others), adding 279 KiB and 189 ms of main-thread time.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 208 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Document request latency

    20 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 211 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.5 s

    21.5 s

    Your largest element takes 21.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The Apex of Electrofishing Learn more”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.5 s

    21.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 63 ms to 93 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 87 ms

    87 ms

    Real visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 158 ms

    158 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 158 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix67
  • Page weight: 3.9 MB in 24 requests

    3.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 24 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (8), stylesheets 1.1 MB (5) and images 532 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.11 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.11 g of CO₂e: 133.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9150
  • Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation (1 element)

    Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

1 checks passed
  • 2 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 6 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 2 passed and 4 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

10 to fixGoogle 8347
  • No page title

    Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.

  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.smith-root.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

1 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.smith-root.com/llms.txt (1 KiB, 0 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10065
  • No mobile viewport

    No viewport meta tag, so phones render the desktop layout zoomed out.

  • No HTML doctype

    The page has no <!DOCTYPE html>, so browsers render it in quirks mode.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

Content and conversion

6 to fix25
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 8 words

    The homepage has only about 8 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at smith-root.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
pair Networks

Company

Headquarters
Vancouver

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on smith-root.com, including 16 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25