Website review, no card needed

smithoptics.com logo

smithoptics.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202648 issues · 88 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on smithoptics.com, 15 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 12.4 MB in 478 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s1.3 sMay 9Oct 242.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
240 ms181 msMay 9Oct 24213 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026228 ms
May 16, 2026228 ms
May 23, 2026233 ms
May 30, 2026231 ms
Jun 6, 2026219 ms
Jun 13, 2026208 ms
Jun 20, 2026196 ms
Jun 27, 2026188 ms
Jul 4, 2026188 ms
Jul 11, 2026191 ms
Jul 18, 2026194 ms
Jul 25, 2026195 ms
Aug 1, 2026196 ms
Aug 8, 2026199 ms
Aug 15, 2026205 ms
Aug 22, 2026211 ms
Aug 29, 2026215 ms
Sep 5, 2026218 ms
Sep 12, 2026220 ms
Sep 19, 2026221 ms
Sep 26, 2026219 ms
Oct 3, 2026214 ms
Oct 10, 2026213 ms
Oct 17, 2026212 ms
Oct 24, 2026213 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of smithoptics.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. smithoptics.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. smithoptics.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. smithoptics.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  4. smithoptics.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  5. smithoptics.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  6. smithoptics.com at 7.0 s7.0 s
  7. smithoptics.com at 8.2 s8.2 s
  8. smithoptics.com at 9.4 s9.4 s

Speed

14 to fix38
  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 52). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 9.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4,756 HTML elements

    The page has 4,756 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ContentSquare and Shopify and others), adding 3.2 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 728 ms

    728 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 728 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    200 ms · 638 KiB

    40 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (638 KiB).

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 435 KiB

    435 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Render-blocking requests

    600 ms

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    420 ms · 74 KiB

    About 74 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 420 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    425 KiB

    11 images could be 425 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Shopify adds 225 ms

    225 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 225 ms of main-thread work and 778 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ContentSquare adds 283 ms

    283 ms

    ContentSquare costs a phone 283 ms of main-thread work and 171 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Klaviyo adds 135 ms

    135 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 135 ms of main-thread work and 340 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 189 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    50 ms · 14 KiB

    14 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    39 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 39 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 21 ms

    21 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Speed Index: 15.7 s

    15.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 42.0 s

    42.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 42.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.4 s

    8.4 s

    Your largest element takes 8.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 75% slower for real visitors

    +75%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 228 ms to 213 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 187 ms

    187 ms

    Real visitors wait 187 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 762 ms

    762 ms

    Real visitors wait 762 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix33
  • Page weight: 12.4 MB in 478 requests

    12.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.4 MB in 478 requests on a phone: images 6.5 MB (81), scripts 3.9 MB (153) and other files 1.3 MB (169). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 35 images far larger than shown

    557 KiB

    35 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1080 at 1,080 px wide, shown at 340 px. Resized copies would save about 557 KiB.

  • 40 images below the first screen load straight away

    40 images further down the page (5.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 21 images in older formats

    21 images (3.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.51 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.51 g of CO₂e: 421.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 10091
  • 19 text elements with low contrast

    19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 7 images without alt text

    7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9284
  • Meta description is long (167 characters)

    Your meta description is 167 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Unexpected token ']', ...", ], ""... is not va)”.

  • 8 links with vague text

    8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 248 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 248 pages on smithoptics.com and 9 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 65 characters

    Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Smith Optics Official Store | Sunglasses, Goggles, Helmets & More”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.smithoptics.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,001 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.smithoptics.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    https://www.smithoptics.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.smithoptics.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 7 pages without a meta description

    https://www.smithoptics.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/guides-choice-collection, https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/pages/smith-x-quoc, https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/archive-collection, https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/lowdown-collection and https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/core-collection and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/pages/find-a-store, https://www.smithoptics.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/new-arrivals, https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/best-sellers, https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/products/gift-card and https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/sale and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 11 pages with very little text

    https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/new-arrivals, https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/best-sellers, https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/sale, https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/4d-mag-series, https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/guides-choice-collection and https://www.smithoptics.com/en-us/collections/squad-goggles and 5 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 108 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7785
  • 12 small tap targets

    12 of 22 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SOCKET_NOT_CONNECTED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 779 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 779 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP PRESCRIPTION”.

  • 32 calls to action

    The homepage has 32 calls to action, for example “Shop Under $200”, “Shop All Sunglasses” and “Shop All Prescription”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 20 cookies set on arrival

    20

    Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 41 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at smithoptics.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on smithoptics.com, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25