Website review, no card needed

snoonu.com logo

snoonu.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202646 issues · 84 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on snoonu.com, 21 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.5 s3.0 sMay 9Oct 243.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.4 s
Jun 6, 20263.4 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.5 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.7 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.6 s
Jul 25, 20263.5 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.6 s
Aug 22, 20263.8 s
Aug 29, 20264.0 s
Sep 5, 20264.1 s
Sep 12, 20264.1 s
Sep 19, 20264.1 s
Sep 26, 20264.1 s
Oct 3, 20264.3 s
Oct 10, 20264.3 s
Oct 17, 20264.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
339 ms243 msMay 9Oct 24254 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026260 ms
May 16, 2026275 ms
May 23, 2026296 ms
May 30, 2026312 ms
Jun 6, 2026320 ms
Jun 13, 2026323 ms
Jun 20, 2026328 ms
Jun 27, 2026327 ms
Jul 4, 2026326 ms
Jul 11, 2026318 ms
Jul 18, 2026305 ms
Jul 25, 2026296 ms
Aug 1, 2026285 ms
Aug 8, 2026279 ms
Aug 15, 2026280 ms
Aug 22, 2026278 ms
Aug 29, 2026275 ms
Sep 5, 2026267 ms
Sep 12, 2026263 ms
Sep 19, 2026260 ms
Sep 26, 2026262 ms
Oct 3, 2026265 ms
Oct 10, 2026264 ms
Oct 17, 2026260 ms
Oct 24, 2026254 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of snoonu.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. snoonu.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. snoonu.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  3. snoonu.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  4. snoonu.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  5. snoonu.com at 7.1 s7.1 s
  6. snoonu.com at 8.6 s8.6 s
  7. snoonu.com at 10.0 s10.0 s
  8. snoonu.com at 11.4 s11.4 s

Speed

9 to fix40
  • Improve image delivery

    2.5 s · 13.5 MB

    38 images could be 13.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 13.9 MB

    52 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (13.9 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 846 KiB

    About 846 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 40

    40/100

    Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 792 KiB and 846 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 402 ms

    402 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 402 ms of main-thread work and 365 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 51 KiB

    About 51 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 237 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    43 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 43 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 424 ms

    424 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 424 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Real visitors wait 5.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.5 s

    15.5 s

    Your largest element takes 15.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “marketing-campaign”.

  • Speed Index: 14.6 s

    14.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.2 s

    22.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.259

    0.259

    The layout shifts by 0.259 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user INP: 439 ms

    439 ms

    Real visitors wait 439 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.17

    0.17

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 25% slower for real visitors

    +25%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 471 ms

    471 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 471 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 260 ms to 254 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

5 to fix14
  • Page weight: 17.2 MB in 257 requests

    17.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 17.2 MB in 257 requests on a phone: images 14.3 MB (63), scripts 2.2 MB (119) and other files 477 KiB (58). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 3.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    1.5 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example e5f742d5-a33d-4ff4-87d7-917db3c110a7_output.png at 2,058 px wide, shown at 366 px. Resized copies would save about 1.5 MB.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (4.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    e5f742d5-a33d-4ff4-87d7-917db3c110a7_output.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 4.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.88 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.88 g of CO₂e: 585.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8792
  • 33 buttons without a name

    33 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (97 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 97 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (13 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 73 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 6 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10087
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (164 characters)

    Your meta description is 164 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 105 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 105 pages on snoonu.com and 14 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Snoonu - online shopping with fast delivery”.

  • Title: 63 characters

    Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Snoonu - Qatar’s First Super App for Food, Groceries & Services”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://snoonu.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 3 AI answer engine crawlers

    3 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://snoonu.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (258 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix70
  • 10 pages without a title

    https://snoonu.com/restaurants, https://snoonu.com/scity, https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/health-and-beauty, https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/electronics, https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/pets and https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/baby-and-kids and 4 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 10 pages without a meta description

    https://snoonu.com/restaurants, https://snoonu.com/scity, https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/health-and-beauty, https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/electronics, https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/pets and https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/baby-and-kids and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://snoonu.com/merchants/29669, whose canonical is https://snoonu.com/electronics/hisense. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 10 pages without an H1

    https://snoonu.com/restaurants, https://snoonu.com/scity, https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/health-and-beauty, https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/electronics, https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/pets and https://snoonu.com/snoonu-market/baby-and-kids and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://snoonu.com/groceries/snoomart took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7785
  • 22 small tap targets

    22 of 79 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 307 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 307 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Download”.

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Download”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude, Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 26 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at snoonu.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on snoonu.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25