Website review, no card needed

snopes.com logo

snopes.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202631 issues · 83 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on snopes.com, 9 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.2 s1.1 sApr 18Oct 31.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.1 s
Apr 25, 20261.1 s
May 2, 20261.1 s
May 9, 20261.1 s
May 16, 20261.2 s
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.1 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
99 ms88 msApr 18Oct 397 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 202692 ms
Apr 25, 202693 ms
May 2, 202693 ms
May 9, 202693 ms
May 16, 202691 ms
May 23, 202689 ms
May 30, 202689 ms
Jun 6, 202689 ms
Jun 13, 202690 ms
Jun 20, 202691 ms
Jun 27, 202693 ms
Jul 4, 202694 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202694 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202695 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 202696 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 202696 ms
Sep 12, 202697 ms
Sep 19, 202698 ms
Sep 26, 202698 ms
Oct 3, 202697 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of snopes.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. snopes.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. snopes.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. snopes.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. snopes.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. snopes.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. snopes.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. snopes.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. snopes.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

4 to fix57
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 292 KiB

    About 292 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 99). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    650 ms · 162 KiB

    6 images could be 162 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Scorecard Research and others), adding 236 KiB and 261 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    190 ms · 92 KiB

    About 92 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 190 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 218 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    20 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (20 KiB).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 99 but mobile only 57. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 695 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 14 ms

    14 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    Your largest element takes 8.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Trump flags fly as rioters take over the steps of the Capit…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 522 ms

    522 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 522 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 92 ms to 97 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors wait 0.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 110 ms

    110 ms

    Real visitors wait 110 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 389 ms

    389 ms

    Real visitors wait 389 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix90
  • 1 image far larger than shown

    28 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example ifcn_badge.png at 414 px wide, shown at 113 px. Resized copies would save about 28 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (84 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (108 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.33 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.33 g of CO₂e: 39.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.2 MB in 43 requests

    1.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.2 MB in 43 requests on a phone: scripts 691 KiB (14), images 357 KiB (13) and HTML 84 KiB (1). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8390
  • 16 tap targets too small

    16 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • <svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text (11 elements)

    <svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 9 text elements with low contrast

    9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 64 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9287
  • Title is long (131 characters)

    Your title is 131 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Snopes.com | The definitive fact-checking site and reference source for urban legends, fo…”.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 130 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 130 pages on snopes.com and 10 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 116 characters

    Your meta description is 116 characters: “The definitive Internet reference source for researching urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Snopes Homepage”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.snopes.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://media.snopes.com/sitemaps/sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 2 AI answer engine crawlers

    2 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,122 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    /support and /tips all use the title “Support Snopes With Our Monthly Membership | Snopes.com”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 9 pages share a meta description

    /support and /tips use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /fact-checks, whose canonical is /fact-check. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 10 pages without an H1

    /contact, /latest, /top, /category/politics, /category/Entertainment and /fact-check and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 85 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 26 small tap targets

    26 of 45 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 1,300 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,300 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Learn more →”, “Contact Us” and “Subscribe Now”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 17 cookies set on arrival

    17

    Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 35 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at snopes.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on snopes.com, including 10 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25