Website review, no card needed
snu.ac.kr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202642 issues · 82 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on snu.ac.kr, 19 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 7.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 235 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 176 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 170 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 160 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
7.0 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 7.0 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 468 KiBAbout 468 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.6 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.6 s).
Improve image delivery
4.9 MB30 images could be 4.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
900 ms · 886 KiB81 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (886 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Minify JavaScript
750 ms · 145 KiB145 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Document request latency
550 ms · 93 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive about 550 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
547 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 547 ms on a phone.
Server response: 647 ms
647 msYour server takes 647 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 11 KiBAbout 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 168 KiB and 95 ms of main-thread time.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 55 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.8 s
A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 187 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.5 s
5.5 sReal visitors wait 5.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.8 s
4.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 8.1 s
8.1 sThe first text or image appears after 8.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.6 s
15.6 sYour largest element takes 15.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “서울대학교 개교 80주년 엠블럼(1946 ~ 2026)”.
Time to Interactive: 15.8 s
15.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.5 s
10.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
34 images without width and height
34 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 199 ms
199 msReal visitors wait 199 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.06
0.06For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 235 ms to 160 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.038
0.038The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.038, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 9 ms
9 msScripts block the page for only 9 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 22.4 MB in 88 requests
22.4 MBYour homepage downloads 22.4 MB in 88 requests on a phone: media 13.4 MB (3), images 6.5 MB (64) and fonts 1.1 MB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
25 images in older formats
25 images (6.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
22 images below the first screen load straight away
22 images further down the page (5.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 6.3 g of CO₂ per visit
6.34 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.34 g of CO₂e: 761.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
9 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)
Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 65 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (5 characters)
Your title is only 5 characters: “서울대학교”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
11 H1 headlines
There are 11 <h1> headlines (“서울대학교”, “2026 SNU FASHION SHOW 〈N/A〉 런웨이” and “2026 SNU FASHION SHOW 〈N/A〉”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://snu.ac.kr/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
280 internal links, 128 external
The homepage links to 280 pages on snu.ac.kr and 128 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.snu.ac.kr/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://snu.ac.kr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
14 pages without a meta description
https://snu.ac.kr/academics/undergraduate/snucollege, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/undergraduate/colleges, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/undergraduate/curriculum, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/graduate/graduate_schools, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/graduate/professional_graduate_schools and https://snu.ac.kr/academics/graduate/curriculum and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
12 pages with very little text
https://snu.ac.kr/academics/undergraduate/snucollege, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/undergraduate/colleges, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/undergraduate/curriculum, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/graduate/graduate_schools, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/graduate/professional_graduate_schools and https://snu.ac.kr/academics/graduate/curriculum and 6 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
6 pages slow to respond
https://snu.ac.kr/academics/undergraduate/snucollege, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/undergraduate/colleges, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/undergraduate/curriculum, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/graduate/graduate_schools, https://snu.ac.kr/academics/graduate/curriculum and https://snu.ac.kr/academics/non_degree_courses took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 94 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Executing inline event handler violates the following Content Security Policy directive 'script-src 'self' 'nonce-0b5e0…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 10 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Only about 86 words
The homepage has only about 86 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at snu.ac.kr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on snu.ac.kr, including 19 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.