Website review, no card needed

soa.org logo

soa.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202648 issues · 88 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on soa.org, 18 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.0 s3.3 sMay 9Oct 244.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.7 s
May 16, 20264.7 s
May 23, 20264.8 s
May 30, 20264.7 s
Jun 6, 20264.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.8 s
Jun 20, 20263.5 s
Jun 27, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20264.1 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20264.0 s
Aug 8, 20264.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.8 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.7 s
Sep 12, 20263.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.8 s
Sep 26, 20263.9 s
Oct 3, 20264.0 s
Oct 10, 20264.1 s
Oct 17, 20264.1 s
Oct 24, 20264.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
257 ms197 msMay 9Oct 24235 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026210 ms
May 16, 2026217 ms
May 23, 2026227 ms
May 30, 2026234 ms
Jun 6, 2026236 ms
Jun 13, 2026227 ms
Jun 20, 2026224 ms
Jun 27, 2026223 ms
Jul 4, 2026227 ms
Jul 11, 2026241 ms
Jul 18, 2026245 ms
Jul 25, 2026249 ms
Aug 1, 2026250 ms
Aug 8, 2026237 ms
Aug 15, 2026226 ms
Aug 22, 2026212 ms
Aug 29, 2026204 ms
Sep 5, 2026206 ms
Sep 12, 2026207 ms
Sep 19, 2026211 ms
Sep 26, 2026211 ms
Oct 3, 2026211 ms
Oct 10, 2026214 ms
Oct 17, 2026226 ms
Oct 24, 2026235 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of soa.org (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. soa.org at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. soa.org at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. soa.org at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. soa.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. soa.org at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. soa.org at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. soa.org at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. soa.org at 4.6 s4.6 s

Speed

13 to fix34
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.1 s · 1.4 MB

    46 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    3.0 s · 623 KiB

    About 623 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.3 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 630 KiB

    About 630 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.8 s · 264 KiB

    3 images could be 264 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Minify CSS

    900 ms · 193 KiB

    193 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    900 ms · 191 KiB

    191 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 650 ms

    650 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 650 ms of main-thread work and 707 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 323 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Optanon adds 62 ms

    62 ms

    Optanon costs a phone 62 ms of main-thread work and 517 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    56 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 56 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 68 ms

    68 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 68 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    Your largest element takes 15.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.8 s

    21.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.2 s

    8.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 201 ms

    201 ms

    Real visitors wait 201 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 210 ms to 235 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.7 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.025

    0.025

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.025, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 3.3 MB in 120 requests

    3.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 120 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (34), images 662 KiB (24) and stylesheets 646 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    254 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example public-carousel.png at 2,880 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 254 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (345 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (53 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.94 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.94 g of CO₂e: 112.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8493
  • Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (10 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    7 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (23 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 7764
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (4 characters)

    Your title is only 4 characters: “Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 14 links crawlers can't follow

    14 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 266 internal links, 44 external

    The homepage links to 266 pages on soa.org and 44 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.soa.org/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.soa.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.soa.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,254 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.soa.org/programs/affiliate-benefits is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://www.soa.org/link/e37e6d9ab1194e9bb555d4638f6f446e.aspx, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/what, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/why, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/how, https://www.soa.org/programs/affiliate and https://www.soa.org/programs/affiliate-benefits and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.soa.org/link/e37e6d9ab1194e9bb555d4638f6f446e.aspx, whose canonical is https://www.soa.org/about/membership/membership-dues. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 7 pages without an H1

    https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/what, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/why, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/how, https://www.soa.org/programs/affiliate-benefits, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/candidate-events and https://www.soa.org/programs/usa-student-ambassador and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 127 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5483
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Invalid or unexpected token”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 676 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 676 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join the SOA” and “Learn More”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact SOA”, “Join the SOA” and “Learn More”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 28 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 21 cookies set on arrival

    21

    Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 41 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at soa.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Vue.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Episerver

Company

Founded
1949
Headquarters
Schaumburg

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on soa.org, including 24 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25