Website review, no card needed
soa.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202648 issues · 88 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on soa.org, 18 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 210 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 217 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 227 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 235 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.1 s · 1.4 MB46 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).
Reduce unused CSS
3.0 s · 623 KiBAbout 623 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.3 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.9 s · 630 KiBAbout 630 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
1.8 s · 264 KiB3 images could be 264 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 34
34/100Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
900 ms · 193 KiB193 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
900 ms · 191 KiB191 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Google Tag Manager adds 650 ms
650 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 650 ms of main-thread work and 707 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.6 s
A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 323 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Optanon adds 62 ms
62 msOptanon costs a phone 62 ms of main-thread work and 517 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
56 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 56 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 68 ms
68 msYour server sent the HTML in 68 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.1 s
15.1 sYour largest element takes 15.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 21.8 s
21.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.6 s
5.6 sThe first text or image appears after 5.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.2 s
8.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 201 ms
201 msReal visitors wait 201 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 210 ms to 235 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.7 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.025
0.025The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.025, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.3 MB in 120 requests
3.3 MBYour homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 120 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (34), images 662 KiB (24) and stylesheets 646 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images far larger than shown
254 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example public-carousel.png at 2,880 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 254 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (345 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (53 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.94 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.94 g of CO₂e: 112.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (10 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Invalid ARIA attributes
7 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (23 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (4 characters)
Your title is only 4 characters: “Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
14 links crawlers can't follow
14 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
266 internal links, 44 external
The homepage links to 266 pages on soa.org and 44 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.soa.org/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.soa.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.soa.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,254 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.soa.org/programs/affiliate-benefits is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
14 pages without a meta description
https://www.soa.org/link/e37e6d9ab1194e9bb555d4638f6f446e.aspx, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/what, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/why, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/how, https://www.soa.org/programs/affiliate and https://www.soa.org/programs/affiliate-benefits and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.soa.org/link/e37e6d9ab1194e9bb555d4638f6f446e.aspx, whose canonical is https://www.soa.org/about/membership/membership-dues. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
7 pages without an H1
https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/what, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/why, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/precandidate/how, https://www.soa.org/programs/affiliate-benefits, https://www.soa.org/future-actuaries/candidate-events and https://www.soa.org/programs/usa-student-ambassador and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 127 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Invalid or unexpected token”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 676 words of copy
The homepage carries about 676 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join the SOA” and “Learn More”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact SOA”, “Join the SOA” and “Learn More”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 28 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
21 cookies set on arrival
21Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
41 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at soa.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Vue.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Episerver
Company
- Founded
- 1949
- Headquarters
- Schaumburg
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on soa.org, including 24 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.