Website review, no card needed

solutran.com logo

solutran.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202637 issues · 83 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on solutran.com, 15 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s2.0 sMay 9Oct 242.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.8 s
Jun 6, 20263.9 s
Jun 13, 20264.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
271 ms213 msMay 9Oct 24220 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026241 ms
May 16, 2026245 ms
May 23, 2026255 ms
May 30, 2026253 ms
Jun 6, 2026256 ms
Jun 13, 2026264 ms
Jun 20, 2026261 ms
Jun 27, 2026255 ms
Jul 4, 2026244 ms
Jul 11, 2026225 ms
Jul 18, 2026222 ms
Jul 25, 2026227 ms
Aug 1, 2026228 ms
Aug 8, 2026238 ms
Aug 15, 2026238 ms
Aug 22, 2026239 ms
Aug 29, 2026245 ms
Sep 5, 2026243 ms
Sep 12, 2026242 ms
Sep 19, 2026237 ms
Sep 26, 2026237 ms
Oct 3, 2026236 ms
Oct 10, 2026227 ms
Oct 17, 2026223 ms
Oct 24, 2026220 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of solutran.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. solutran.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. solutran.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. solutran.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. solutran.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. solutran.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. solutran.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  7. solutran.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  8. solutran.com at 4.1 s4.1 s

Speed

12 to fix33
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 1.1 MB

    50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.2 s · 374 KiB

    About 374 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 33

    33/100

    Your mobile performance score is 33 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (gbqofs.com, datadoghq-browser-agent.com and Adobe Tag Manager and others), adding 882 KiB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 508 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • gbqofs.com adds 371 ms

    371 ms

    gbqofs.com costs a phone 371 ms of main-thread work and 208 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • datadoghq-browser-agent.com adds 328 ms

    328 ms

    datadoghq-browser-agent.com costs a phone 328 ms of main-thread work and 59 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Adobe Tag Manager adds 263 ms

    263 ms

    Adobe Tag Manager costs a phone 263 ms of main-thread work and 223 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,085 HTML elements

    The page has 2,085 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    53 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 53 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Improve image delivery

    40 KiB

    2 images could be 40 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.0 s

    17.0 s

    Your largest element takes 17.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Data use: We use cookies and similar tools to make your use…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.6 s

    31.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 8.2 s

    8.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 217 ms

    217 ms

    Real visitors wait 217 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 241 ms to 220 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.7 MB in 153 requests

    4.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 153 requests on a phone: scripts 2.6 MB (73), other files 1.4 MB (55) and stylesheets 380 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.32 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.32 g of CO₂e: 158.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9596
  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9295
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("https://business.optum.com/content/dam/optum/dmp/logo.png")”.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 23 internal links, 26 external

    The homepage links to 23 pages on solutran.com and 26 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 118 characters

    Your meta description is 118 characters: “Healthy Benefits+ by Optum (formerly Solutran) offers a smarter, simpler way to manage supplemental benefits programs.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Supplemental Benefits for Members”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Supplemental Benefits for Members | Optum Business”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://business.optum.com/en/financial-solutions/supplemental-benefits.html.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://business.optum.com/en/site-map.sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,915 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://business.optum.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 16 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 3 pages share a title

    https://business.optum.com/en, https://business.optum.com/en.html and / all use the title “Optum Business - Helping to Create Better Healthcare Solutions”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://business.optum.com/en/insights/ai-brings-scale-precision-directed-spend-benefits.html has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://business.optum.com/en, https://business.optum.com/en.html and / use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://business.optum.com/en.html, whose canonical is https://business.optum.com/en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 12 internal pages checked

    We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 third-party cookies

    3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://prod.ui.search.optum.com/widget/v2.2.0/static/css/async/554.9c888462.css' from ori…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 830 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 830 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get in touch”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Get in touch” and “Do Not Call policy”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (0 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at solutran.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Hosting
UHC

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on solutran.com, including 21 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25