Website review, no card needed
solutran.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202637 issues · 83 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on solutran.com, 15 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 241 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 245 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 255 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 220 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.6 s
2.1 s
2.6 s
3.1 s
3.6 s
4.1 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.9 s · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 1.1 MB50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
Render-blocking requests
2.1 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.2 s · 374 KiBAbout 374 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 33
33/100Your mobile performance score is 33 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.8 s
A phone's processor spends 6.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (gbqofs.com, datadoghq-browser-agent.com and Adobe Tag Manager and others), adding 882 KiB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 508 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
gbqofs.com adds 371 ms
371 msgbqofs.com costs a phone 371 ms of main-thread work and 208 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
datadoghq-browser-agent.com adds 328 ms
328 msdatadoghq-browser-agent.com costs a phone 328 ms of main-thread work and 59 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Adobe Tag Manager adds 263 ms
263 msAdobe Tag Manager costs a phone 263 ms of main-thread work and 223 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,085 HTML elements
The page has 2,085 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
53 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 53 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Improve image delivery
40 KiB2 images could be 40 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.0 s
17.0 sYour largest element takes 17.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Data use: We use cookies and similar tools to make your use…”.
Time to Interactive: 31.6 s
31.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sThe first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 8.2 s
8.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 217 ms
217 msReal visitors wait 217 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 241 ms to 220 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.7 MB in 153 requests
4.7 MBYour homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 153 requests on a phone: scripts 2.6 MB (73), other files 1.4 MB (55) and stylesheets 380 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.32 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.32 g of CO₂e: 158.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("https://business.optum.com/content/dam/optum/dmp/logo.png")”.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
23 internal links, 26 external
The homepage links to 23 pages on solutran.com and 26 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 118 characters
Your meta description is 118 characters: “Healthy Benefits+ by Optum (formerly Solutran) offers a smarter, simpler way to manage supplemental benefits programs.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Supplemental Benefits for Members”.
Title: 50 characters
Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Supplemental Benefits for Members | Optum Business”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://business.optum.com/en/financial-solutions/supplemental-benefits.html.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://business.optum.com/en/site-map.sitemap-index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,915 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://business.optum.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 16 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
https://business.optum.com/en, https://business.optum.com/en.html and / all use the title “Optum Business - Helping to Create Better Healthcare Solutions”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://business.optum.com/en/insights/ai-brings-scale-precision-directed-spend-benefits.html has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages share a meta description
https://business.optum.com/en, https://business.optum.com/en.html and / use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://business.optum.com/en.html, whose canonical is https://business.optum.com/en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
12 internal pages checked
We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 small tap targets
4 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://prod.ui.search.optum.com/widget/v2.2.0/static/css/async/554.9c888462.css' from ori…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 830 words of copy
The homepage carries about 830 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get in touch”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Get in touch” and “Do Not Call policy”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (0 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at solutran.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- UHC
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on solutran.com, including 21 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.