Website review, no card needed
solviads.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202641 issues · 92 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on solviads.com, 12 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 107 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.4 s
2.1 s
2.8 s
3.5 s
4.2 s
4.9 s
5.5 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.1 s43 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.
Improve image delivery
900 ms · 1.4 MB12 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Cookie-Script.com and others), adding 1.4 MB and 962 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 650 KiBAbout 650 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
450 ms · 275 KiB111 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (275 KiB).
YouTube adds 606 ms
606 msYouTube costs a phone 606 ms of main-thread work and 1,014 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
550 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).
Main-thread work: 3.2 s
A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 273 ms
273 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 273 ms of main-thread work and 285 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
120 ms · 132 KiBAbout 132 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 120 ms faster on a phone.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 241 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
20 ms · 2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
5 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 5 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
1 checks passed
Server response: 267 ms
267 msYour server sent the HTML in 267 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.4 s
4.4 sReal visitors wait 4.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors wait 3.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.2 s
9.2 sYour largest element takes 9.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies to personalise content, ads and to analyse o…”.
Time to Interactive: 23.2 s
23.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.4 s
8.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 4.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 398 ms
398 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 398 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 107 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 107 ms
107 msReal visitors wait 107 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.034
0.034The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.034, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.5 MB in 137 requests
4.5 MBYour homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 137 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (30), scripts 1.4 MB (41) and other files 632 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
Mobile-Website-DE-Edited-768x1066.png weighs 507 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
homepage-hero-bg-image.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image in older formats
1 image (507 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.29 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.29 g of CO₂e: 154.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
19 text elements with low contrast
19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (14 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
10 links without text
10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
54 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 54 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (17 characters)
Your title is only 17 characters: “Homepage • Solvia”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (171 characters)
Your meta description is 171 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
81 internal links, 17 external
The homepage links to 81 pages on solviads.com and 17 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Are You Ready For The Next Big Thing?”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.solviads.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: ImageObject, Organization, Place, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.solviads.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.solviads.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (384 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.solviads.com/de all use the title “Homepage • Solvia”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
10 pages slow to respond
https://www.solviads.com/de, https://www.solviads.com/about-us, https://www.solviads.com/our-expertise, https://www.solviads.com/services, https://www.solviads.com/partners and https://www.solviads.com/references and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “window.lintrk is not a function”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
23 of 28 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 389 words of copy
The homepage carries about 389 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Contact Us” and “Subscribe”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at solviads.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Guzelhosting Gnet Internet Telekomunikasyon A.S.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on solviads.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.