Website review, no card needed
soprema.ca website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202634 issues · 109 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on soprema.ca, 16 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
86B- #7,635 of 80,566 reviewed websitesbeats 87%
- #4,154 of 39,626 online storesbeats 85%
- #22 of 601 Magento storesbeats 96%
Closest competitors among Magento stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 115 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 135 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.3 s
1.7 s
2.1 s
2.5 s
3.0 s
3.4 s
soprema.ca does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.8 s · 3.9 MB32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.9 MB).
Improve image delivery
2.8 s · 1.7 MB9 images could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.2 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 306 KiBAbout 306 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.5 s · 259 KiBAbout 259 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 69). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (New Relic, maze.co and hlx.page and others), adding 5.0 MB and 199 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
600 ms · 45 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
assets-library.com adds 0 ms
0 msassets-library.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 4.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.6 s
A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,452 HTML elements
The page has 2,452 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 96 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 17 ms
17 msYour server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 27.0 s
27.0 sYour largest element takes 27.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “SOPREMA”.
Time to Interactive: 28.0 s
28.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.5 s
10.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s
4.5 sThe first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 203 ms
203 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 203 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 135 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 137 ms
137 msReal visitors wait 137 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 773 ms
773 msReal visitors wait 773 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005
0.005The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.8 MB in 427 requests
6.8 MBYour homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 427 requests on a phone: images 4.5 MB (38), scripts 1.2 MB (350) and other files 594 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
sopca-en-fr-cms-home-banner-colphene-lm-3200-1440x540-d.webp weighs 540 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
614 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example sopca-en-fr-cms-webinar-conference-jean-francois-cote-webina at 768 px wide, shown at 150 px. Resized copies would save about 614 KiB.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (1.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.93 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.93 g of CO₂e: 232.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Interactive controls must not be nested (6 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Hidden but focusable
5 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 48 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
53 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 61 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 8 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
7 links with vague text
7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
331 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 331 pages on soprema.ca and 18 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 144 characters
Your meta description is 144 characters: “SOPREMA is an international manufacturer that provides innovative products for waterproofing, insulation, soundproofing…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “SOPREMA - Innovative and Sustainable Solutions for Builders”.
Title: 43 characters
Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Roof and Building Envelope Expert | SOPREMA”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.soprema.ca/en/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.soprema.ca/media/sitemap/sitemap_category.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,605 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 177 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'push')”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
248 of 276 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
2 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://soprema.ca goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.soprema.ca/en/stores/store/redirect/___store/view_soprema_ca_fr/___from_store/view_soprema_ca_en/uenc/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuc29wcmVtYS5jYS9mci8_X19fc3RvcmU9dmlld19zb3ByZW1hX2NhX2Zy/.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (soprema.ca).
Valid certificate (75 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for soprema.ca and is valid for another 75 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://soprema.ca redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 56 links work
All 56 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 16 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
soprema.ca has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
soprema.ca's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 26 years old
26 yearssoprema.ca was registered in Sep 2000 through Gandi Services Inc., Gandi SAS. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Aug 2027
soprema.ca is registered until Aug 2027.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,448 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,448 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact an Expert” and “Sample Request”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Learn More”, “Contact Us” and “Contact an Expert”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be soprema.ca is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 exists:%{i}.spf.hc611-40.c3s2.iphmx.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:spf.emailsignatures365.com include:aspm…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- E-commerce
- Magento
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Fastly
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on soprema.ca, including 17 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.