Website review, no card needed

solerpalau.com logo

solerpalau.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202649 issues · 110 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on solerpalau.com, 16 of them high impact, across 110 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s2.4 sMay 16Oct 312.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Oct 31, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
188 ms110 msMay 16Oct 31162 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026119 ms
May 23, 2026121 ms
May 30, 2026123 ms
Jun 6, 2026129 ms
Jun 13, 2026134 ms
Jun 20, 2026139 ms
Jun 27, 2026144 ms
Jul 4, 2026150 ms
Jul 11, 2026158 ms
Jul 18, 2026163 ms
Jul 25, 2026170 ms
Aug 1, 2026175 ms
Aug 8, 2026176 ms
Aug 15, 2026177 ms
Aug 22, 2026179 ms
Aug 29, 2026178 ms
Sep 5, 2026178 ms
Sep 12, 2026179 ms
Sep 19, 2026179 ms
Sep 26, 2026173 ms
Oct 3, 2026165 ms
Oct 10, 2026159 ms
Oct 17, 2026154 ms
Oct 24, 2026159 ms
Oct 31, 2026162 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of solerpalau.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. solerpalau.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. solerpalau.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. solerpalau.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. solerpalau.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. solerpalau.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  6. solerpalau.com at 5.1 s5.1 s
  7. solerpalau.com at 6.0 s6.0 s
  8. solerpalau.com at 6.8 s6.8 s

solerpalau.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

12 to fix59
  • Improve image delivery

    4.5 s · 6.7 MB

    40 images could be 6.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 259 KiB

    About 259 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    1.0 s · 226 KiB

    226 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    950 ms · 197 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (197 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and Optanon and others), adding 673 KiB and 535 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    400 ms · 86 KiB

    About 86 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    400 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).

  • Main-thread work: 3.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 296 ms

    296 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 296 ms of main-thread work and 358 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,882 HTML elements

    The page has 1,882 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 169 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 107 ms

    107 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 107 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 63.2 s

    63.2 s

    Your largest element takes 63.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “EcoVadis Gold Among the top 5% companies around the world D…”.

  • Speed Index: 19.9 s

    19.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 19.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 67.8 s

    67.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 67.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 34% slower for real visitors

    +34%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 20 images without width and height

    20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 225 ms

    225 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 225 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 179 ms

    179 ms

    Real visitors wait 179 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.054

    0.054

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.054, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 20.5 MB in 364 requests

    20.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 20.5 MB in 364 requests on a phone: images 18.8 MB (130), scripts 1.3 MB (201) and fonts 300 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 40 images in older formats

    40 images (10.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 5.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.82 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.82 g of CO₂e: 697.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8389
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 9 tap targets too small

    9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts

    Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 156 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 6 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8574
  • Title is long (78 characters)

    Your title is 78 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Soler & Palau - S&P Ventilation Systems and Indoor Air Quality | Soler & Palau”.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (untyped) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Unexpected token ']', ..." ] "... is not va)”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.solerpalau.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 149 internal links, 27 external

    The homepage links to 149 pages on solerpalau.com and 27 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “S&P Ventilation Group is a world leader in efficient and sustainable ventilation solutions for multiple sectors and pro…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.solerpalau.com/en-en/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,209 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 7 pages without a meta description

    /en-en/sustainability-and-environment, /en-en/products, /en-en/products/mcv-residential-ventilation, /en-en/products/mcv-residential-ventilation/heat-recovery-units, /en-en/products/mcv-residential-ventilation/whole-house-extract-units and /en-en/products/mcv-residential-ventilation/mev-multiple-dwellings and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /en-en/international-distributors has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 121 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 44 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix88
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://solerpalau.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://sportal.solerpalau.com/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (solerpalau.com).

  • Valid certificate (101 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for solerpalau.com and is valid for another 101 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://solerpalau.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 60 links work

    All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    solerpalau.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    solerpalau.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 25 years old

    25 years

    solerpalau.com was registered in Jun 2001 through Dinahosting s.l.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Jun 2027

    solerpalau.com is registered until Jun 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,000 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,000 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Where to buy”.

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Where to buy”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

Email authentication

1 to fix50
  • No DMARC policy

    solerpalau.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • Email authentication score: 50/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 mx a:mail2.solerpalau.com a:mail.solerpalau.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:79.81.207.218 -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 23 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Magento
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on solerpalau.com, including 23 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25