Website review, no card needed

spacedaily.com logo

spacedaily.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202630 issues · 83 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on spacedaily.com, 8 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 13.5 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s722 msApr 18Oct 3826 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.5 s
Apr 25, 20261.5 s
May 2, 20261.4 s
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.1 s
Jun 6, 20261.0 s
Jun 13, 2026984 ms
Jun 20, 2026979 ms
Jun 27, 2026971 ms
Jul 4, 2026943 ms
Jul 11, 2026904 ms
Jul 18, 2026884 ms
Jul 25, 2026881 ms
Aug 1, 2026869 ms
Aug 8, 2026861 ms
Aug 15, 2026860 ms
Aug 22, 2026857 ms
Aug 29, 2026859 ms
Sep 5, 2026856 ms
Sep 12, 2026834 ms
Sep 19, 2026827 ms
Sep 26, 2026825 ms
Oct 3, 2026826 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
133 ms101 msApr 18Oct 3114 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026129 ms
Apr 25, 2026121 ms
May 2, 2026121 ms
May 9, 2026120 ms
May 16, 2026117 ms
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026114 ms
Jun 6, 2026115 ms
Jun 13, 2026117 ms
Jun 20, 2026117 ms
Jun 27, 2026115 ms
Jul 4, 2026112 ms
Jul 11, 2026109 ms
Jul 18, 2026106 ms
Jul 25, 2026106 ms
Aug 1, 2026106 ms
Aug 8, 2026105 ms
Aug 15, 2026105 ms
Aug 22, 2026106 ms
Aug 29, 2026108 ms
Sep 5, 2026110 ms
Sep 12, 2026111 ms
Sep 19, 2026112 ms
Sep 26, 2026113 ms
Oct 3, 2026114 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of spacedaily.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. spacedaily.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. spacedaily.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. spacedaily.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. spacedaily.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. spacedaily.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. spacedaily.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. spacedaily.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. spacedaily.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

12 to fix60
  • Main-thread work: 13.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 13.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Pubmatic adds 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Pubmatic costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 98 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Pubmatic, Rubicon Project and script.ac and others), adding 1.4 MB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 1.1 MB

    20 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 68). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 629 KiB

    108 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (629 KiB).

  • Rubicon Project adds 582 ms

    582 ms

    Rubicon Project costs a phone 582 ms of main-thread work and 83 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    561 KiB

    About 561 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • script.ac adds 333 ms

    333 ms

    script.ac costs a phone 333 ms of main-thread work and 90 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 317 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 262 ms

    262 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 262 ms of main-thread work and 356 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 189 ms

    189 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 189 ms of main-thread work and 337 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    31 KiB

    About 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify JavaScript

    10 ms · 4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 46.6 s

    46.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 46.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Your largest element takes 3.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 114 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors wait 0.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 109 ms

    109 ms

    Real visitors wait 109 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 330 ms

    330 ms

    Real visitors wait 330 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 44% faster for real visitors

    -44%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 0.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix50
  • Page weight: 4.3 MB in 1,079 requests

    4.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 1,079 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (72), images 1.4 MB (294) and other files 745 KiB (545). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    486 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example mir-space-station-1024x538.png at 1,024 px wide, shown at 112 px. Resized copies would save about 486 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (587 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.22 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.22 g of CO₂e: 145.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9598
  • 27 text elements with low contrast

    27 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 56 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9297
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 81 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 81 pages on spacedaily.com and 6 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 136 characters

    Your meta description is 136 characters: “Space Daily covers missions, astronomy, Earth systems, life sciences and the engineering of discovery. Independent repo…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Copper wire from 1963 MIT project still orbiting Earth decades later”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Space Daily | Space, Earth, Nature and Engineering”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://spacedaily.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://spacedaily.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://spacedaily.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,048 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://spacedaily.com/long-reads and https://spacedaily.com/archive have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://spacedaily.com/newsletter has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • 53 third-party cookies

    53 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    29 of 31 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 800 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 800 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SUBSCRIBE”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Subscribe”, “Contact” and “Subscribe →”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Plausible and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Taboola and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 57 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 57 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at spacedaily.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Analytics | Plausible

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on spacedaily.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25